From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751901AbdHYE5Z (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Aug 2017 00:57:25 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:48601 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751411AbdHYE5X (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Aug 2017 00:57:23 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 14:57:21 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Christoffer Dall , Marc Zyngier , Catalin Marinas Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , James Morse , Julien Thierry Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the arm64 tree Message-ID: <20170825145721.51c56af3@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in: arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h between commit: 1f9b8936f36f ("arm64: Decode information from ESR upon mem faults") from the arm64 tree and commit: c5511c3c068c ("KVM: arm/arm64: Fix guest external abort matching") from the kvm-arm tree. I fixed it up (I used the former version) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell