From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752647AbdH1JFa (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Aug 2017 05:05:30 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:52530 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752281AbdH1JF2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Aug 2017 05:05:28 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:05:21 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Petr Mladek , Steven Rostedt , Jan Kara , Andrew Morton , Jiri Slaby , Andreas Mohr , Tetsuo Handa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: printk: what is going on with additional newlines? Message-ID: <20170828090521.GA25025@amd> References: <20170815025625.1977-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wac7ysb48OaltWcw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170815025625.1977-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --wac7ysb48OaltWcw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! In 4.13-rc, printk("foo"); printk("bar"); seems to produce foo\nbar. That's... quite surprising/unwelcome. What is going on there? Are timestamps responsible? Pavel =09 --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --wac7ysb48OaltWcw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlmj3NAACgkQMOfwapXb+vLOPQCfQgnjnZN92ljTi9AiWfh6iX7t s/MAoI7YVhjw9+QIZB9i4K8Hr0hZKQHV =Jo8+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wac7ysb48OaltWcw--