linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Abysmal scheduler performance in Linus' tree?
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 18:14:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170906161422.kvqe5y6b3ng6ouyu@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170906090333.7v627vdyvhe3x2cs@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 11:03:33AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 01:59:14AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > > Any specifics on your setup?
> > 
> > On further fiddling, I only see this after a suspend and resume cycle.
> 
> Ah, ok. That's not something I otherwise test. Lets see if I can force
> this brick of mine through a suspend-resume cycle :-)

I'd be suspicious of these here commits:

  77d1dfda0e79 ("sched/topology, cpuset: Avoid spurious/wrong domain rebuilds")
  09e0dd8e0f2e ("sched/topology: Avoid pointless rebuild")
  bbdacdfed2f5 ("sched/debug: Optimize sched_domain sysctl generation")

I tested them with regular hotplug, but suspend resume always is a tad
funny.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-06 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-06  5:13 Abysmal scheduler performance in Linus' tree? Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06  8:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-06  8:59   ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-09-06  9:03     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-06 16:14       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2017-09-07  6:15         ` Mike Galbraith
2017-09-07  7:31           ` Ingo Molnar
2017-09-07  9:13           ` [PATCH] sched/cpuset/pm: Fix cpuset vs suspend-resume Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-07  9:26             ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-07 10:54               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-09-07 20:38               ` Tejun Heo
2017-09-07 10:33             ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/cpuset/pm: Fix cpuset vs. suspend-resume bugs tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-06  9:15 ` Abysmal scheduler performance in Linus' tree? Chris Wilson
2017-09-06  9:24   ` Peter Zijlstra
     [not found]     ` <150469312649.28581.17626550155735691534@mail.alporthouse.com>
2017-09-06 10:44       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-06 10:51         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-09-07  8:16           ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/fair: Fix wake_affine_llc() balancing rules tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170906161422.kvqe5y6b3ng6ouyu@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).