From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1755113AbdIGJqp (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 7 Sep 2017 05:46:45 -0400
Received: from mail-wr0-f194.google.com ([209.85.128.194]:37762 "EHLO
        mail-wr0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1754869AbdIGJqo (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 7 Sep 2017 05:46:44 -0400
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb5Nmw1JF8WLMI5ISjiel89TVQbLPvxKJMBLDT8udR9Cin9NdSDqbGqR5vENz9WRswQBY121Pg==
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 11:46:40 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 01/17] x86/asm/64: Remove the restore_c_regs_and_iret label
Message-ID: <20170907094640.cbyqem5zysuoyshw@gmail.com>
References: <cover.1504733277.git.luto@kernel.org>
 <ba61a33873be123a92907862e895f41e5455ce7a.1504733277.git.luto@kernel.org>
 <20170907094015.c3kcmt4xbzhp6r4c@pd.tnic>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170907094015.c3kcmt4xbzhp6r4c@pd.tnic>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 02:36:46PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > The only user was the 64-bit opportunistic SYSRET failure path, and
> > that path didn't really need it.  This change makes the
> > opportunistic SYSRET code a bit more straightforward and gets rid of
> > the label.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 5 ++---
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> Btw, you need to refresh your stuff because of those UNWIND_HINT_EMPTY
> things. I get:
> 
> checking file arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 245 (offset 5 lines).
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 308.
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 637 (offset 88 lines).
> 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED
> 
> Otherwise
> 
> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>

I'd suggest tip:master or upstream 24e700e291d5 as a post-merge-window base for 
x86 bits.

Thanks,

	Ingo