From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751226AbdIOJfZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2017 05:35:25 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f194.google.com ([209.85.128.194]:33090 "EHLO mail-wr0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750879AbdIOJfX (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2017 05:35:23 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb5IvhxP6bw4hOVIiA4idfQsbcWztb3AprycEdC6xXZUQab9y/X4Z15f/cZXR1G+Wz4atcZiAw== Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 11:35:20 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Pavel Machek Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andy Lutomirski , X86 ML , Borislav Petkov , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: x60: warnings on boot and resume, arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:257 initialize_ ... was Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix resume failure due to PCID Message-ID: <20170915093520.xzulap5wiijwfdyf@gmail.com> References: <20170915065936.GA6580@amd> <20170915083901.aql6zkcabewy52kb@gmail.com> <20170915091642.GA11125@amd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170915091642.GA11125@amd> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > * Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > On Wed 2017-09-06 20:25:10, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > > > > Patch 1 is the fix. Patch 2 is a comment that would have kept me from > > > > > chasing down a false lead. > > > > > > > > Yes, this seems to fix things for me. Thanks. > > > > > > > > Of course, right now that laptop has no working wifi with tip-of-tree > > > > due to some issues with the networking tree, but that's an independent > > > > thing and I could suspend and resume with this. So applied and pushed > > > > out, > > > > > > Ok, seems this is still not completely right, I'm now getting WARN_ON > > > during boot and on every resume... but machine works. > > > > > > 4.14-rc0, 32-bit. > > > > Which SHA1, just to make sure? (Please enable CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO=y.) > > 46c1e79fee417f151547aa46fae04ab06cb666f4, AFAICT. Ok, just to reiterate: that SHA1 has all relevant and current fixes included, so this definitely is an open regression. Thanks, Ingo