From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751856AbdIUUUc (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Sep 2017 16:20:32 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45766 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751697AbdIUUUa (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Sep 2017 16:20:30 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F369E21EA8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=rostedt@goodmis.org Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 16:20:27 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Tom Zanussi Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mhiramat@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, vedang.patel@intel.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, joel.opensrc@gmail.com, joelaf@google.com, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, baohong.liu@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/40] tracing: Inter-event (e.g. latency) support Message-ID: <20170921162027.1eb0d8c7@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <1505846668.29775.13.camel@tzanussi-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <20170919123113.499b59b1@gandalf.local.home> <1505846668.29775.13.camel@tzanussi-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 13:44:28 -0500 Tom Zanussi wrote: > Yeah, it's almost ready. At this point, I've addressed all the comments > except for: > > - PATCH v2 25/40] tracing: Add support for dynamic tracepoints > > which I need to do a little bit of research on to figure out what > exactly I need to do there. Let me know if you need any help. > > I was also kind of looking for a couple patches from you to fold in > which you had mentioned you were going to send for: > > - [PATCH v2 35/40] tracing: Reverse the order event_mutex/trace_types_lock are taken OK, I have a stand alone patch that you don't need to fold in that does this properly. I tested the crap out of it (missed a few places), but should be good. I'll send that netx. > - [PATCH v2 40/40] tracing: Add trace_event_buffer_reserve() variant that allows recursion I have this working too, but want to test it a little more before sending. Once I do, you can add both patches ahead of your series. I may just apply them to my tree now and start running them through my formal tests. > > I've been using the trace_recursive_lock() patch you posted in place of > the latter and it's working fine. :-) Thanks! -- Steve