From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752376AbdIWNEJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Sep 2017 09:04:09 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f193.google.com ([209.85.128.193]:33323 "EHLO mail-wr0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752047AbdIWNA7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Sep 2017 09:00:59 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCaJve2H3DtJ+8IlyDGPmUAJFhTs8lf13cecZXuk0oFHKGDZXAJ1hSPfaxfi9RthDbG2Dc2mA== From: Ingo Molnar To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andrew Morton , Eric Biggers , Andy Lutomirski , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , Fenghua Yu , "H . Peter Anvin" , Linus Torvalds , Oleg Nesterov , Peter Zijlstra , Rik van Riel , Thomas Gleixner , Yu-cheng Yu Subject: [PATCH 19/33] x86/fpu: Decouple fpregs_activate()/fpregs_deactivate() from fpu->fpregs_active Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 15:00:02 +0200 Message-Id: <20170923130016.21448-20-mingo@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0 In-Reply-To: <20170923130016.21448-1-mingo@kernel.org> References: <20170923130016.21448-1-mingo@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The fpregs_activate()/fpregs_deactivate() are currently called in such a pattern: if (!fpu->fpregs_active) fpregs_activate(fpu); ... if (fpu->fpregs_active) fpregs_deactivate(fpu); But note that it's actually safe to call them without checking the flag first. This further decouples the fpu->fpregs_active flag from actual FPU logic. Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Fenghua Yu Cc: H. Peter Anvin Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Rik van Riel Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Yu-cheng Yu Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h | 7 +------ arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c | 3 +-- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h index 7fa676f93ac1..42a601673c09 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu/internal.h @@ -526,8 +526,6 @@ static inline int fpregs_state_valid(struct fpu *fpu, unsigned int cpu) */ static inline void fpregs_deactivate(struct fpu *fpu) { - WARN_ON_FPU(!fpu->fpregs_active); - fpu->fpregs_active = 0; this_cpu_write(fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx, NULL); trace_x86_fpu_regs_deactivated(fpu); @@ -535,8 +533,6 @@ static inline void fpregs_deactivate(struct fpu *fpu) static inline void fpregs_activate(struct fpu *fpu) { - WARN_ON_FPU(fpu->fpregs_active); - fpu->fpregs_active = 1; this_cpu_write(fpu_fpregs_owner_ctx, fpu); trace_x86_fpu_regs_activated(fpu); @@ -604,8 +600,7 @@ static inline void user_fpu_begin(void) struct fpu *fpu = ¤t->thread.fpu; preempt_disable(); - if (!fpu->fpregs_active) - fpregs_activate(fpu); + fpregs_activate(fpu); preempt_enable(); } diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c index eab244622402..01a47e9edfb4 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c @@ -426,8 +426,7 @@ void fpu__drop(struct fpu *fpu) asm volatile("1: fwait\n" "2:\n" _ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 2b)); - if (fpu->fpregs_active) - fpregs_deactivate(fpu); + fpregs_deactivate(fpu); } } else { WARN_ON_FPU(fpu->fpregs_active); -- 2.11.0