From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S934245AbdIYJQq (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 25 Sep 2017 05:16:46 -0400
Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:40570 "EHLO
        merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S934071AbdIYJQo (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 25 Sep 2017 05:16:44 -0400
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 11:16:33 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, bigeasy@linutronix.de, efault@gmx.de,
        max.byungchul.park@gmail.com, kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] smp/hotplug: Differentiate the AP-work lockdep class
 between up and down
Message-ID: <20170925091633.s3mtuk3f7is5lj2e@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20170920170014.548896195@infradead.org>
 <20170920170546.922524234@infradead.org>
 <20170925085459.GK5994@X58A-UD3R>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170925085459.GK5994@X58A-UD3R>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 05:54:59PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 07:00:20PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > With lockdep-crossrelease we get deadlock reports that span cpu-up and
> > cpu-down chains. Such deadlocks cannot possibly happen because cpu-up
> > and cpu-down are globally serialized.
> > 
> >   CPU0                  CPU1                    CPU2
> >   cpuhp_up_callbacks:   takedown_cpu:           cpuhp_thread_fun:
> > 
> >   cpuhp_state
> >                         irq_lock_sparse()
> >     irq_lock_sparse()
> >                         wait_for_completion()
> >                                                 cpuhp_state
> >                                                 complete()
> > 
> > Now that we have consistent AP state, we can trivially separate the
> > AP-work class between up and down using st->bringup.
> 
> Could you tell me what branch you worked the patches based on?
> This is similar to the problem of workqueue so I want to fix it on
> top of yours, as well.

I wrote the patches on top of tip/master. Thomas maintains these bits so
hopefully he'll eventually merge them in the right tip tree.