From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752565AbdJ0TYZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Oct 2017 15:24:25 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:53027 "EHLO mail-wm0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750998AbdJ0TYV (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Oct 2017 15:24:21 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+TnXjH0loaMOypHX0c+DtUQVRhUCqTyFYe0d7WMHSVgT36iOGMVp6Wf8/Wd/DyMNgTpRZmz5Q== Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 21:24:17 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Craig Bergstrom Cc: Linus Torvalds , Sander Eikelenboom , Boris Ostrovsky , Fengguang Wu , wfg@linux.intel.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , LKP Subject: Re: ce56a86e2a ("x86/mm: Limit mmap() of /dev/mem to valid physical addresses"): kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/physaddr.c:79! Message-ID: <20171027192417.d2x4cy6ra7fghjzw@gmail.com> References: <440615a7-6cc0-a607-ce7c-22a34b69e8fe@eikelenboom.it> <1d203c07-0595-a33a-620b-c51eea9721d1@eikelenboom.it> <8721eeac-a644-e815-55e9-5f01956dd22a@eikelenboom.it> <20171026163911.dnovh4zaik5qumtt@gmail.com> <20171026190229.zt743ooxvjsukmis@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Craig Bergstrom wrote: > Reverting seems like the right approach at the moment. My apologies > for the breakage so late the in the cycle. Note that there's no need for you to apologize and you carry exactly zero amount of blame for the late-cycle breakage: it was my decision to send it to Linus so quickly, you never asked for it to be sent upstream on such a short notice. ( Classic "patch makes sense, looks good, other arches ar doing this too, and I tested it myself too on multiple systems, so it must be obviously fine for everyone" moment. ) Your change still makes sense from a robustness POV, so please send it again with the suggested fixes - and I'll be more careful with the upstream merge this time. Thanks, Ingo