From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754490AbdKAJ21 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Nov 2017 05:28:27 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:49797 "EHLO mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754372AbdKAJ2X (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Nov 2017 05:28:23 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+Qm1kHgdKOYToyXTCRBcIe5a/Pzs1LoU0NpiOtGPC+2+2+u9wGcW1MJ66CYOoCcOFcLEIsRZw== Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 09:28:19 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM , Bjorn Helgaas , Alan Stern , Greg Kroah-Hartman , LKML , Linux ACPI , Linux PCI , Linux Documentation , Mika Westerberg , Ulf Hansson , Andy Shevchenko , Kevin Hilman , Wolfram Sang , linux-i2c Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] PM / mfd: intel-lpss: Use DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND Message-ID: <20171101092819.thhofiwwjxblef4a@dell> References: <3806130.B2KCK0tvef@aspire.rjw.lan> <5094729.JAaD38WncM@aspire.rjw.lan> <20171031150933.oho2ffvuj3iagx4m@dell> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 31 Oct 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki > >> > >> Make the intel-lpss driver set DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND for its > >> devices which will allow them to stay in runtime suspend during > >> system suspend unless they need to be reconfigured for some reason. > >> > >> Also make it avoid resuming its child devices if they have > >> DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND set to allow them to remain in runtime > >> suspend during system suspend. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > >> --- > >> drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.c | 6 +++++- > >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > Is this patch independent? > > It depends on the flag definition at least, but functionally it also > depends on the PCI support for the flag. No problem. Which tree to you propose this goes through? > > For my own reference: > > Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog