From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754978AbdKAReS (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Nov 2017 13:34:18 -0400 Received: from gateway36.websitewelcome.com ([192.185.198.13]:24312 "EHLO gateway36.websitewelcome.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751653AbdKAReR (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Nov 2017 13:34:17 -0400 Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 12:34:15 -0500 Message-ID: <20171101123415.Horde.loz1BKI5e4PY4wt8KJqogy7@gator4166.hostgator.com> From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" To: David Miller Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, wharms@bfs.de, hal@kd.net.au Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] refactor code and mark expected switch fall-throughs References: <20171022203942.Horde.vHHdAHmZbpcBFTJEP0yIy9k@gator4166.hostgator.com> <20171101.204658.787298649317439690.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20171101.204658.787298649317439690.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Horde Application Framework 5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator4166.hostgator.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - embeddedor.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 108.167.133.22 X-Source-L: Yes X-Exim-ID: 1e9wu7-0049MR-Vm X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: gator4166.hostgator.com [108.167.133.22]:34168 X-Source-Auth: garsilva@embeddedor.com X-Email-Count: 7 X-Source-Cap: Z3V6aWRpbmU7Z3V6aWRpbmU7Z2F0b3I0MTY2Lmhvc3RnYXRvci5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting David Miller : > From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" > Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:50:57 -0500 > >> The aim of this patchset is firstly to refactor code in nr_route.c >> in order to make it >> easier to read and maintain and, secondly, to mark some expected >> switch fall-throughs >> in preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough. >> >> I have to mention that I did not implement any unit test. >> If someone has any suggestions on how I could test this piece of code >> it'd be greatly appreciated. > > Series applied, thank you. Glad to help. Thanks -- Gustavo A. R. Silva