From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933159AbdKAPWB (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:22:01 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:36176 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754714AbdKAPV4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:21:56 -0400 Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 16:22:08 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Tom Gall Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, linux- stable Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/20] 4.4.96-stable review Message-ID: <20171101152208.GE23371@kroah.com> References: <20171031095510.079198256@linuxfoundation.org> <33A8ADBE-3195-4E2B-BC73-F395E5DC1008@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <33A8ADBE-3195-4E2B-BC73-F395E5DC1008@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 04:33:25PM -0500, Tom Gall wrote: > > > On Oct 31, 2017, at 4:55 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.96 release. > > There are 20 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Thu Nov 2 09:55:01 UTC 2017. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.96-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > > ------------- > > > > Results from the Linaro test farm. Two regressions observed. I don’t believe either are > cause for alarm. Ok, thanks for testing and letting me know, hopefully the tests can get fixed up. greg k-h