From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Cc: steven.sistare@oracle.com, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] mm: buddy page accessed before initialized
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2017 14:54:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171102135423.voxnzk2qkvfgu5l3@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a9b637b0-2ff0-80e8-76a7-801c5c0820a8@oracle.com>
On Thu 02-11-17 09:39:58, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
[...]
> Hi Michal,
>
> Previously as before my project? That is because memory for all struct pages
> was always zeroed in memblock, and in __free_one_page() page_is_buddy() was
> always returning false, thus we never tried to incorrectly remove it from
> the list:
>
> 837 list_del(&buddy->lru);
>
> Now, that memory is not zeroed, page_is_buddy() can return true after kexec
> when memory is dirty (unfortunately memset(1) with CONFIG_VM_DEBUG does not
> catch this case). And proceed further to incorrectly remove buddy from the
> list.
OK, I thought this was a regression from one of the recent patches. So
the problem is not new. Why don't we see the same problem during the
standard boot?
> This is why we must initialize the computed buddy page beforehand.
Ble, this is really ugly. I will think about it more.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-02 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-31 15:50 [PATCH v1 0/1] buddy page accessed before initialized Pavel Tatashin
2017-10-31 15:50 ` [PATCH v1 1/1] mm: " Pavel Tatashin
2017-11-02 13:32 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-02 13:39 ` Pavel Tatashin
2017-11-02 13:54 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-11-02 14:00 ` Pavel Tatashin
2017-11-02 14:08 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-02 14:16 ` Pavel Tatashin
2017-11-02 14:27 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-02 16:10 ` Pavel Tatashin
2017-11-03 8:59 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-03 14:17 ` Pavel Tatashin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171102135423.voxnzk2qkvfgu5l3@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
--cc=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).