From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933471AbdKCR5o (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2017 13:57:44 -0400 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:46618 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751839AbdKCR5l (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2017 13:57:41 -0400 Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 10:57:38 -0700 From: Tony Lindgren To: Andrew Morton Cc: Joonsoo Kim , Michal Hocko , Stephen Rothwell , Linus Torvalds , Russell King - ARM Linux , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Regression still in next for drop migrate type checks Message-ID: <20171103175738.GL28152@atomide.com> References: <20171103160012.GF28152@atomide.com> <20171103103224.524541d001571f63daa8fdcc@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171103103224.524541d001571f63daa8fdcc@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Andrew Morton [171103 17:34]: > On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:00:12 -0700 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > Looks like I'm still carrying patch "mm: distinguish CMA and MOVABLE > > isolation in has_unmovable_pages" from Michal [1] for commit e1d753dff0fa > > ("mm: drop migrate type checks from has_unmovable_pages") and Linux next > > has been broken for CMA for few weeks now as noted in the discussion > > also at [1]. > > > > What's the status of this regression? How come it's been known > > broken for two weeks and still not fixed or reverted in next? > > This is clearly is not suitable for "wider testing" ;) > > Travel to Europe and subsequent bustage in the -next tree held things > up. Today's merge looks good so I expect to get this into Stephen > today. OK thanks for the update. > In future, please feel free to send such hot fixes to Stephen. Sure. Tony