From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754742AbdKCINV (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2017 04:13:21 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:41971 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751960AbdKCINS (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2017 04:13:18 -0400 Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 19:13:16 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Linus Walleij Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Masahiro Yamada Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio tree Message-ID: <20171103191316.27a28dd9@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: References: <20171102162038.339466ef@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Linus, On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 08:50:31 +0100 Linus Walleij wrote: > > I applied this patch to the GPIO tree, I guess it is the right thing > to do at this point. Umm, you can't really validly apply my merge fix patch to the gpio tree without merging in part of the tip tree (it will generate, at least, warnings in your build testing of your tree) ... > I suspect the IRQ infrastructure will be pulled to Torvald's tree > first anyway. You just need to let Linus know that this update is require (maybe provide him with my merge fix patch) when you send your pull request. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell