From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755519AbdKCVAt (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2017 17:00:49 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:46151 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752284AbdKCVAj (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2017 17:00:39 -0400 Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 14:00:35 -0700 From: Darren Hart To: Mario.Limonciello@dell.com Cc: andy.shevchenko@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, luto@kernel.org, quasisec@google.com, pali.rohar@gmail.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, mjg59@google.com, hch@lst.de, greg@kroah.com, gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 00/16] Introduce support for Dell SMBIOS over WMI Message-ID: <20171103210035.GA21142@fury> References: <20171103005025.GA7971@fury> <3ee790eeb8e242f2a064905074777674@ausx13mpc124.AMER.DELL.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3ee790eeb8e242f2a064905074777674@ausx13mpc124.AMER.DELL.COM> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 04:30:13PM +0000, Mario.Limonciello@dell.com wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvhart@infradead.org] > > Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2017 7:50 PM > > To: Limonciello, Mario > > Cc: Andy Shevchenko ; LKML > kernel@vger.kernel.org>; platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org; Andy Lutomirski > > ; quasisec@google.com; pali.rohar@gmail.com; > > rjw@rjwysocki.net; mjg59@google.com; hch@lst.de; Greg KH ; > > Alan Cox > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 00/16] Introduce support for Dell SMBIOS over WMI > > > > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 02:25:21PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote: > > > The existing way that the dell-smbios helper module and associated > > > other drivers (dell-laptop, dell-wmi) communicate with the platform > > > really isn't secure. It requires creating a buffer in physical > > > DMA32 memory space and passing that to the platform via SMM. > > > > > > Since the platform got a physical memory pointer, you've just got > > > to trust that the platform has only modified (and accessed) memory > > > within that buffer. > > > > > > Dell Platform designers recognize this security risk and offer a > > > safer way to communicate with the platform over ACPI. This is > > > in turn exposed via a WMI interface to the OS. > > > > > > When communicating over WMI-ACPI the communication doesn't occur > > > with physical memory pointers. When the ASL is invoked, the fixed > > > length ACPI buffer is copied to a small operating region. The ASL > > > will invoke the SMI, and SMM will only have access to this operating > > > region. When the ASL returns the buffer is copied back for the OS > > > to process. > > > > > > This method of communication should also deprecate the usage of the > > > dcdbas kernel module and software dependent upon it's interface. > > > Instead offer a character device interface for communicating with this > > > ASL method to allow userspace to use instead. > > > > > > To faciliate that this patch series introduces a generic way for WMI > > > drivers to be able to create discoverable character devices with > > > a predictable IOCTL interface through the WMI bus when desired. > > > Requiring WMI drivers to explicitly ask for this functionality will > > > act as an effective vendor whitelist to character device creation. > > > > > > Some of this work is the basis for what will be a proper interpreter > > > of MOF in the kernel and controls for what drivers will be able to > > > do with that MOF. > > > > > > NOTE: This patch series is intended to go on top of platform-drivers-x86 > > > linux-next. > > > > > > For convenience the entire series including those is also available here: > > > https://github.com/dell/linux/tree/wmi-smbios > > > > Queued for testing, thanks Mario. > > > > -- > > Darren Hart > > VMware Open Source Technology Center > > Thanks Darren. BTW Did you forget to push? I didn't see it at the testing branch: > http://git.infradead.org/users/dvhart/linux-platform-drivers-x86.git/shortlog/refs/heads/testing > > Thanks, > The workflow currently goes first to review-dvhart, which 0-day will pull from, then to testing for integration, then to for-next. I plan to move it to testing today. -- Darren Hart VMware Open Source Technology Center