From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752587AbdKENvY (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Nov 2017 08:51:24 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:51790 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750725AbdKENvX (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Nov 2017 08:51:23 -0500 Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2017 14:51:35 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Philippe Ombredanne Cc: Johan Hovold , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Thomas Gleixner , Kate Stewart Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] USB: add SPDX identifiers to all remaining files in drivers/usb/ Message-ID: <20171105135135.GA6062@kroah.com> References: <20171019083832.GA21820@kroah.com> <20171103102830.GA18343@kroah.com> <20171103165301.GR7223@localhost> <20171104104010.GA27490@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Nov 05, 2017 at 01:53:54PM +0100, Philippe Ombredanne wrote: > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 05:53:01PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 11:28:30AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >> > It's good to have SPDX identifiers in all files to make it easier to > >> > audit the kernel tree for correct licenses. > >> > > >> > Update the drivers/usb/ and include/linux/usb* files with the correct > >> > SPDX license identifier based on the license text in the file itself. > >> > The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used > >> > instead of the full boiler plate text. > >> > > >> > This work is based on a script and data from Thomas Gleixner, Philippe > >> > Ombredanne, and Kate Stewart. > >> > > >> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner > >> > Cc: Kate Stewart > >> > Cc: Philippe Ombredanne > >> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman > >> > >> I noticed several MODULE_LICENSE macros which did not match the headers > >> (e.g. "GPL" being used for version 2 only modules) for which I'll send a > >> follow-up patch. > >> > >> Someone should probably write a script for that once the SPDX > >> identifiers are in. > > > > Yes, I think that someone might have a script for that, it will be much > > easier to detect these things now. The issue is that the "v2" marking > > came after the original "GPL" marking for MODULE_LICENSE() from what I > > remember, so many of those will be wrong. > > If this can help my [1] tool can detect both header-level licenses-in-comments > as well as MODULE_LICENSE macros. Based on that we could reasonably > easily craft a script that scans a file and report discrepancies > between the two. That would be great, as there are going to be a lot of these showing up soon, as we start adding the SPDX identifiers to the files based on the license text and the mis-matches become obvious. thanks, greg k-h