linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression still in next for drop migrate type checks
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 15:22:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171106232255.GN28152@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171104083544.qhekx4xqgxj5kezr@dhcp22.suse.cz>

* Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> [171104 08:37]:
> On Sat 04-11-17 09:25:00, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 03-11-17 09:00:12, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > Looks like I'm still carrying patch "mm: distinguish CMA and MOVABLE
> > > isolation in  has_unmovable_pages" from Michal [1] for commit e1d753dff0fa
> > > ("mm: drop migrate type checks from has_unmovable_pages") and Linux next
> > > has been broken for CMA for few weeks now as noted in the discussion
> > > also at [1].
> > > 
> > > What's the status of this regression? How come it's been known
> > > broken for two weeks and still not fixed or reverted in next?
> > > This is clearly is not suitable for "wider testing" ;)
> > 
> > This is the first time I hear about the regression. Joonsoo has pointed
> > out that there might be a problem but he didn't have any specific
> > failure in hands. The fix has been posted [1] and Andrew has picked it
> > up few days ago. Could you try to apply that patch? It will show up in
> > linux-next as soon as Andrew releases mmotm.
> 
> Just noticed that Andrew has already released mmotm with the patch
> included. I would appreciate if you could just apply this patch on top
> of failing kernel to double check and have your Tested-by.

Yes Linux next now works for me like I replied earlier. Probably already
too late for a Tested-by as it's been applied :)

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-06 23:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-03 16:00 Tony Lindgren
2017-11-03 17:32 ` Andrew Morton
2017-11-03 17:57   ` Tony Lindgren
2017-11-04  8:25 ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-04  8:35   ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-06 23:22     ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2017-11-06 14:38   ` Tony Lindgren
2017-11-06 14:42     ` Michal Hocko
2017-11-07  2:20       ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171106232255.GN28152@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --subject='Re: Regression still in next for drop migrate type checks' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
on how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox