From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753322AbdKGKYY (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Nov 2017 05:24:24 -0500 Received: from sym2.noone.org ([178.63.92.236]:43513 "EHLO sym2.noone.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751423AbdKGKYW (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Nov 2017 05:24:22 -0500 Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 11:24:19 +0100 From: Tobias Klauser To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arch , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] asm-generic/io.h: remove unnecessary include of linux/vmalloc.h Message-ID: <20171107102418.GI1370@distanz.ch> References: <20170905112727.13668-1-tklauser@distanz.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Arnd On 2017-09-05 at 17:11:50 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Tobias Klauser wrote: > > Including linux/vmalloc.h in asm-generic/io.h isn't necessary since none > > of the definitions are used in the header itself. Remove the include in > > order to avoid potential header dependency problems if other headers > > rely on implict inclusion of linux/vmalloc.h which means that changes > > there could break unrelated parts. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser > > --- > > include/asm-generic/io.h | 1 - > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/io.h b/include/asm-generic/io.h > > index b4531e3b2120..d2d3bd163f5f 100644 > > --- a/include/asm-generic/io.h > > +++ b/include/asm-generic/io.h > > @@ -764,7 +764,6 @@ static inline void iowrite64_rep(volatile void __iomem *addr, > > > > #ifdef __KERNEL__ > > > > -#include > > #define __io_virt(x) ((void __force *)(x)) > > > > #ifndef CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP > > This seems like a good idea in principle, but I think it needs to be tested > well before we apply it, to avoid breaking random drivers that forgot to > add their own includes of that header. > > I've added your patch to my testing queue, but not to the asm-generic > tree now. We should see if it leads to any randconfig build regressions > on the architectures I normally test. Did you see any other breakages caused by this patch in your testing queue besides the ones you alredy reported/fixed? Would this be something appropriate to submit during the next merge window? Or at least to be included in linux-next so it gets some more coverage? Thanks Tobias