From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753950AbdKIJvy (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2017 04:51:54 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:50141 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752690AbdKIJvv (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2017 04:51:51 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 10:51:48 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Kate Stewart , Philippe Ombredanne Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] USB: add SPDX identifiers to all remaining files in drivers/usb/ Message-ID: <20171109095148.GC6074@amd> References: <20171019083832.GA21820@kroah.com> <20171103102830.GA18343@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lMM8JwqTlfDpEaS6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171103102830.GA18343@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --lMM8JwqTlfDpEaS6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > It's good to have SPDX identifiers in all files to make it easier to > audit the kernel tree for correct licenses. >=20 > Update the drivers/usb/ and include/linux/usb* files with the correct > SPDX license identifier based on the license text in the file itself. > The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used > instead of the full boiler plate text. >=20 > This work is based on a script and data from Thomas Gleixner, Philippe > Ombredanne, and Kate Stewart. >=20 > Cc: Thomas Gleixner > Cc: Kate Stewart > Cc: Philippe Ombredanne > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman > --- > v2: Use the "standard" format of putting the identifier at the top of > the file, and use // for .c and .h files. > Removed the files already marked in Linus's tree. >=20 > Unless someone really complains, I'm going to add this to my tree for > 4.15-rc1. as you said in some other email... this stands out a bit too much. What about using normal c comments, and put it near the original license text? It is not exactly the most important thing... Or maybe near the MODULE_LICENSE, so the two don't get out of sync? --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --lMM8JwqTlfDpEaS6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAloEJTQACgkQMOfwapXb+vKxtgCgq1b8m6/ggNWRM7WySqIeHYBh hK4Anjx8VpP5R2iSDGJC4WHJeUhXuHHT =EsTH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lMM8JwqTlfDpEaS6--