From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751756AbdKKLSM (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Nov 2017 06:18:12 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:33272 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751069AbdKKLSL (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Nov 2017 06:18:11 -0500 Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 12:18:19 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Marcus Wolf Cc: Dan Carpenter , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: staging: pi433: Possible bug in rf69.c Message-ID: <20171111111819.GA14436@kroah.com> References: <709d3e3f-be3b-aa98-1cf6-6a048ef14d7b@smarthome-wolf.de> <20171110193258.qv6dbokqpjrrq3yb@mwanda> <20171111084501.chwx5ku2senlgdza@mwanda> <2e82e800-618a-b332-41c8-ee8aa97da88b@smarthome-wolf.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2e82e800-618a-b332-41c8-ee8aa97da88b@smarthome-wolf.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 11:42:09AM +0200, Marcus Wolf wrote: > Hi Dan, > > thanks fot the link. I can't remeber, why and what I wanted to redo. Maybe > there was a complaint about the format of the patch... > > In that patch, we also have the topic with the '>> 3', we were discussing a > few days ago! > > I'd suggest, not to invest the history any more. I'm ok with preparing a new > patch/new patches, so we can import the fixes. > > I also have several improvements for the rf69.c, I'd like to offer. > > But I still need to know when to use staging and when to use linux-next. > I don't want to prepare patches for the wrong tree. I recommend waiting for 4.15-rc1 to come out, all of the different trees will be merged, and then you can just work off of the staging-next tree and I can take the patches. thanks, greg k-h