From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752738AbdKWJCK (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 23 Nov 2017 04:02:10 -0500
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:41301 "EHLO
        bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751631AbdKWJCH (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 23 Nov 2017 04:02:07 -0500
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 01:02:00 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, peterz@infradead.org,
        rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        daniel@iogearbox.net, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] enable creating [k,u]probe with perf_event_open
Message-ID: <20171123090200.GB10669@infradead.org>
References: <20171115172339.1791161-1-songliubraving@fb.com>
 <20171122050045.cjt4legewplt3yet@ast-mbp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20171122050045.cjt4legewplt3yet@ast-mbp>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from <hch@infradead.org> by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Just curious: why do you want to overload a multiplexer syscall even
more instead of adding explicit syscalls?