From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752270AbdKZQnn (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Sun, 26 Nov 2017 11:43:43 -0500
Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com ([74.125.82.52]:39510 "EHLO
        mail-wm0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751887AbdKZQnm (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 26 Nov 2017 11:43:42 -0500
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMaPzSvPQAdtZUEi3FTw5oprOWaD4yirC+OzO4rCIuM2rSDc9EHnnPmrdIpMNFvuGUwvLTfYEQ==
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 17:43:38 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@suse.de>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/entry: Fix assumptions that the HW TSS is at the
 beginning of cpu_tss
Message-ID: <20171126164338.fj7fd5r6ig5akdid@gmail.com>
References: <cover.1510371795.git.luto@kernel.org>
 <03fb20a8639aeecfeda3ba18a520ce646267eb9a.1510371795.git.luto@kernel.org>
 <2fdf9cf9-ec48-e63f-2ec8-44160c206c9a@intel.com>
 <20171126134844.o4nz6kuuzsflxrw6@gmail.com>
 <CALCETrUNM_xsxMKbw1nrvgaF-_bRJtfFCFFrjook0zJ=6urq-Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20171126155837.ludnd6va4rqy5d37@gmail.com>
 <20171126160023.mxwfa33fad472r7i@gmail.com>
 <CALCETrXHpgkwRMM3WhW97YtDas2Yk+75rkJ=h1dPTveBp=3Lxg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXHpgkwRMM3WhW97YtDas2Yk+75rkJ=h1dPTveBp=3Lxg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Could you please do a delta to the very latest WIP.x86/mm instead?
> >>
> >> In the latest I have included the review tags already, and all the easy-to-do
> >> review feedback as well, so the delta should be rasonably small.
> >>
> >> These entry bits are destined for x86/urgent real soon, so Thomas and me are
> >> trying to pin the tree down and do delta changes only.
> >>
> >> If it's a simple full interdiff between your latest and WIP.x86/mm that's fine as
> >> well, can backmerge everything accordingly.
> >
> > Also feel free to include the two unwinder enhancements from you and Josh in the
> > delta series (as two separate patches) - WIP.x86/mm won't change more today.
> 
> I can do that.  Or if you want to get testing going, you can just pick
> them up -- I'm not planning on touching either one of of them.

I was hoping for proper changelogs and SOBs for both of them ;-)

Thanks,

	Ingo