From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753450AbdK1Xxd (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2017 18:53:33 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:57155 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753380AbdK1Xxb (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2017 18:53:31 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 10:53:29 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Al Viro Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , David Howells Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with Linus' tree Message-ID: <20171129105329.41031142@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Al, Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got conflicts in several files due to commit: 1751e8a6cb93 ("Rename superblock flags (MS_xyz -> SB_xyz)") from Linus' tree and commit: c2c6773f9942 ("VFS: Roll out mount flag differentiation (MS_* -> SB_*) generally") from the vfs tree. I just dropped the vfs tree for today, can you please clean it up? -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell