linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pasha.tatashin@oracle.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: check pfn_valid first in zero_resv_unavail
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 10:42:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171201094215.aenoqa5jepdc3jd5@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171201092951.GA2943@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>

On Fri 01-12-17 17:29:51, Dave Young wrote:
> On 12/01/17 at 10:19am, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 01-12-17 16:56:57, Dave Young wrote:
> > > On 11/30/17 at 10:35am, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > Can we exclude that range from the memblock allocator instead? E.g. what
> > > > happens if somebody allocates from that range?
> > > 
> > > It is a EFI BGRT image buffer provided by firmware, they are reserved
> > > always and can not be used to allocate memory.
> > 
> > Hmm, I see but I was actually suggesting to remove this range from the
> > memblock allocator altogether (memblock_remove) as it shouldn't be there
> > in the first place.
> 
> Oh, I'm not sure because it is introduced as a way for efi to reserve
> boot services areas to be persistent across kexec reboot. See
> drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c: efi_mem_reserve(), BGRT is only one user
> of it, there is esrt and maybe other users, I do not know if it is safe
> :(

Hmm, so it this range ever backed by a valid pfn?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-01  9:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-30  6:04 [PATCH] mm: check pfn_valid first in zero_resv_unavail Dave Young
2017-11-30  9:35 ` Michal Hocko
2017-12-01  8:56   ` Dave Young
2017-12-01  9:19     ` Michal Hocko
2017-12-01  9:29       ` Dave Young
2017-12-01  9:42         ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-12-01  9:49           ` Dave Young
2017-11-30 17:25 ` Pavel Tatashin
2017-12-01  8:57   ` Dave Young

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171201094215.aenoqa5jepdc3jd5@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).