From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751776AbdK3XgI (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Nov 2017 18:36:08 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:56945 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750923AbdK3XgE (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Nov 2017 18:36:04 -0500 Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 10:36:02 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Al Viro Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , David Howells Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with Linus' tree Message-ID: <20171201103602.1b83eec7@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20171129105329.41031142@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20171129105329.41031142@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Al, On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 10:53:29 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got conflicts in several files > due to commit: > > 1751e8a6cb93 ("Rename superblock flags (MS_xyz -> SB_xyz)") > > from Linus' tree and commit: > > c2c6773f9942 ("VFS: Roll out mount flag differentiation (MS_* -> SB_*) generally") > > from the vfs tree. > > I just dropped the vfs tree for today, can you please clean it up? Ping? -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell