From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751481AbdLAQel (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2017 11:34:41 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:38580 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750977AbdLAQej (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2017 11:34:39 -0500 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org E98BB6025C Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=sboyd@codeaurora.org Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 08:34:37 -0800 From: Stephen Boyd To: Yixun Lan Cc: Neil Armstrong , Jerome Brunet , Kevin Hilman , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Michael Turquette , Carlo Caione , Qiufang Dai , linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: dts: meson-axg: add clock DT info for Meson AXG SoC Message-ID: <20171201163437.GE19419@codeaurora.org> References: <20171128125330.363-1-yixun.lan@amlogic.com> <20171128125330.363-4-yixun.lan@amlogic.com> <20171129193536.GB19419@codeaurora.org> <8353c264-3253-0268-91fc-8d42fbe82611@amlogic.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8353c264-3253-0268-91fc-8d42fbe82611@amlogic.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/30, Yixun Lan wrote: > Hi Stephen > > On 11/30/17 03:35, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > On 11/28, Yixun Lan wrote: > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-axg.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-axg.dtsi > >> index b932a784b02a..36a2e98338a8 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-axg.dtsi > >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-axg.dtsi > >> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ > >> #include > >> #include > >> #include > >> +#include > >> > >> / { > >> compatible = "amlogic,meson-axg"; > >> @@ -148,6 +149,20 @@ > >> #address-cells = <0>; > >> }; > >> > >> + hiubus: hiubus@ff63c000 { > > > > Maybe just call the node "bus@ff63c000"? > > > isn't this just a name? what's the benefits to change? > personally, I tend to keep it this way, because it's better map to the > data sheet > > we also has 'aobus', 'cbus' scattered there.. Per the ePAPR node names are supposed to be generic, like disk, cpu, display-controller, gpu, etc. I've never heard of a hiubus, so probably it's some vendor specific thing? We have the phandle anyway so it's not like we're losing much information here. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project