From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751904AbdLARZ2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2017 12:25:28 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:58578 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750988AbdLARZZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2017 12:25:25 -0500 Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 09:25:19 -0800 From: Matthew Wilcox To: "Wang, Wei W" Cc: Tetsuo Handa , "virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "mst@redhat.com" , "mhocko@kernel.org" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "mawilcox@microsoft.com" , "david@redhat.com" , "cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com" , "mgorman@techsingularity.net" , "aarcange@redhat.com" , "amit.shah@redhat.com" , "pbonzini@redhat.com" , "liliang.opensource@gmail.com" , "yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com" , "quan.xu@aliyun.com" , "nilal@redhat.com" , "riel@redhat.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 05/10] xbitmap: add more operations Message-ID: <20171201172519.GA27192@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <1511963726-34070-1-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> <1511963726-34070-6-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> <201711301934.CDC21800.FSLtJFFOOVQHMO@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <5A210C96.8050208@intel.com> <201712012202.BDE13557.MJFQLtOOHVOFSF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <286AC319A985734F985F78AFA26841F739376DA1@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <286AC319A985734F985F78AFA26841F739376DA1@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 03:09:08PM +0000, Wang, Wei W wrote: > On Friday, December 1, 2017 9:02 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > > If start == end is legal, > > > > for (; start < end; start = (start | (IDA_BITMAP_BITS - 1)) + 1) { > > > > makes this loop do nothing because 10 < 10 is false. > > How about "start <= end "? Don't ask Tetsuo for his opinion, write some userspace code that uses it.