From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752119AbdLARpj (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2017 12:45:39 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42386 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751085AbdLARph (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Dec 2017 12:45:37 -0500 Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 18:45:30 +0100 From: Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= To: Vitaly Kuznetsov Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Haiyang Zhang , Stephen Hemminger , Andy Lutomirski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@linuxdriverproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 5/6] x86/kvm: pass stable clocksource to guests when running nested on Hyper-V Message-ID: <20171201174529.GA17073@flask> References: <20171201131321.918-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> <20171201131321.918-6-vkuznets@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171201131321.918-6-vkuznets@redhat.com> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.28]); Fri, 01 Dec 2017 17:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2017-12-01 14:13+0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov: > Currently, KVM is able to work in 'masterclock' mode passing > PVCLOCK_TSC_STABLE_BIT to guests when the clocksource we use on the host > is TSC. When running nested on Hyper-V we normally use a different one: > TSC page which is resistant to TSC frequency changes on event like L1 > migration. Add support for it in KVM. > > The only non-trivial change in the patch is in vgettsc(): when updating > our gtod copy we now need to get both the clockread and tsc value. > > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov > --- > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > @@ -1374,6 +1375,11 @@ static u64 compute_guest_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, s64 kernel_ns) > +static inline int gtod_cs_mode_good(int mode) "good" isn't saying much; I'd like to express that TSC is the underlying clock ... What about "bool gtod_is_based_on_tsc()"? > +{ > + return mode == VCLOCK_TSC || mode == VCLOCK_HVCLOCK; > +} > + > @@ -1606,9 +1625,17 @@ static inline u64 vgettsc(u64 *cycle_now) > long v; > struct pvclock_gtod_data *gtod = &pvclock_gtod_data; > > - *cycle_now = read_tsc(); > + if (gtod->clock.vclock_mode == VCLOCK_HVCLOCK) { > + u64 tsc_pg_val; > + > + tsc_pg_val = hv_read_tsc_page_tsc(hv_get_tsc_page(), cycle_now); This function might fail to update cycle_now and return -1. I guess we should propagate the failure in that case. > + v = (tsc_pg_val - gtod->clock.cycle_last) & gtod->clock.mask; > + } else { > + /* VCLOCK_TSC */ > + *cycle_now = read_tsc(); > + v = (*cycle_now - gtod->clock.cycle_last) & gtod->clock.mask; cycle_now is getting pretty confusing -- it still is TSC timestamp, but now we also have the current cycle of gtod, which might be the TSC page timestamp. Please rename cycle_now to tsc_timestamp in the call tree, thanks.