From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752884AbdLDAoe (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Dec 2017 19:44:34 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f68.google.com ([74.125.83.68]:37054 "EHLO mail-pg0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752079AbdLDAoa (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Dec 2017 19:44:30 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYx+gN2VQArj8aCPMMfm7hKW6cGf2BEZeSq0rXzTj41ZG2ZW2zPncHJRRiO0uWONeLiEhkmcA== Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2017 16:44:27 -0800 From: Eric Biggers To: Jens Axboe Cc: syzbot , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: possible deadlock in blk_trace_remove Message-ID: <20171204004427.GA13374@zzz.localdomain> References: <001a1141f8dc4440a9055e53896e@google.com> <20171203202434.GD844@zzz.localdomain> <9f7ab661-7d57-3e84-769c-6d103557f342@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9f7ab661-7d57-3e84-769c-6d103557f342@kernel.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 05:24:32PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 12/03/2017 01:24 PM, Eric Biggers wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 02:36:01AM -0800, syzbot wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> syzkaller hit the following crash on > >> d9e0e63d9a6f88440eb201e1491fcf730272c706 > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/master > >> compiler: gcc (GCC) 7.1.1 20170620 > >> .config is attached > >> Raw console output is attached. > >> > >> Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this bug yet. > >> > >> > >> Use struct sctp_sack_info instead > >> > >> ============================================ > >> WARNING: possible recursive locking detected > >> 4.14.0-rc8-next-20171110+ #40 Not tainted > >> -------------------------------------------- > >> syz-executor6/21462 is trying to acquire lock: > >> (&q->blk_trace_mutex){+.+.}, at: [] > >> blk_trace_remove+0x21/0x40 kernel/trace/blktrace.c:373 > >> > >> but task is already holding lock: > >> (&q->blk_trace_mutex){+.+.}, at: [] > >> blk_trace_setup+0x38/0x70 kernel/trace/blktrace.c:606 > >> > >> other info that might help us debug this: > >> Possible unsafe locking scenario: > > > > #syz fix: blktrace: fix trace mutex deadlock > > This is fixed in current -git. > I know, but syzbot needed to be told what commit fixes the bug. See https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/master/docs/syzbot.md