From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752366AbdLDP7n (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 10:59:43 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:60412 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752276AbdLDP7j (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 10:59:39 -0500 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Herbert Xu , Steffen Klassert , Guenter Roeck Subject: [PATCH 3.18 02/12] ipsec: Fix aborted xfrm policy dump crash Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 16:59:16 +0100 Message-Id: <20171204155916.580778933@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.15.1 In-Reply-To: <20171204155916.489136969@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20171204155916.489136969@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Herbert Xu commit 1137b5e2529a8f5ca8ee709288ecba3e68044df2 upstream. An independent security researcher, Mohamed Ghannam, has reported this vulnerability to Beyond Security's SecuriTeam Secure Disclosure program. The xfrm_dump_policy_done function expects xfrm_dump_policy to have been called at least once or it will crash. This can be triggered if a dump fails because the target socket's receive buffer is full. This patch fixes it by using the cb->start mechanism to ensure that the initialisation is always done regardless of the buffer situation. Fixes: 12a169e7d8f4 ("ipsec: Put dumpers on the dump list") Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert Cc: Guenter Roeck Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 25 +++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c @@ -1625,32 +1625,34 @@ static int dump_one_policy(struct xfrm_p static int xfrm_dump_policy_done(struct netlink_callback *cb) { - struct xfrm_policy_walk *walk = (struct xfrm_policy_walk *) &cb->args[1]; + struct xfrm_policy_walk *walk = (struct xfrm_policy_walk *)cb->args; struct net *net = sock_net(cb->skb->sk); xfrm_policy_walk_done(walk, net); return 0; } +static int xfrm_dump_policy_start(struct netlink_callback *cb) +{ + struct xfrm_policy_walk *walk = (struct xfrm_policy_walk *)cb->args; + + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*walk) > sizeof(cb->args)); + + xfrm_policy_walk_init(walk, XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_ANY); + return 0; +} + static int xfrm_dump_policy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb) { struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk); - struct xfrm_policy_walk *walk = (struct xfrm_policy_walk *) &cb->args[1]; + struct xfrm_policy_walk *walk = (struct xfrm_policy_walk *)cb->args; struct xfrm_dump_info info; - BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct xfrm_policy_walk) > - sizeof(cb->args) - sizeof(cb->args[0])); - info.in_skb = cb->skb; info.out_skb = skb; info.nlmsg_seq = cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq; info.nlmsg_flags = NLM_F_MULTI; - if (!cb->args[0]) { - cb->args[0] = 1; - xfrm_policy_walk_init(walk, XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_ANY); - } - (void) xfrm_policy_walk(net, walk, dump_one_policy, &info); return skb->len; @@ -2384,6 +2386,7 @@ static const struct nla_policy xfrma_spd static const struct xfrm_link { int (*doit)(struct sk_buff *, struct nlmsghdr *, struct nlattr **); + int (*start)(struct netlink_callback *); int (*dump)(struct sk_buff *, struct netlink_callback *); int (*done)(struct netlink_callback *); const struct nla_policy *nla_pol; @@ -2397,6 +2400,7 @@ static const struct xfrm_link { [XFRM_MSG_NEWPOLICY - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_add_policy }, [XFRM_MSG_DELPOLICY - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_get_policy }, [XFRM_MSG_GETPOLICY - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_get_policy, + .start = xfrm_dump_policy_start, .dump = xfrm_dump_policy, .done = xfrm_dump_policy_done }, [XFRM_MSG_ALLOCSPI - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_alloc_userspi }, @@ -2443,6 +2447,7 @@ static int xfrm_user_rcv_msg(struct sk_b { struct netlink_dump_control c = { + .start = link->start, .dump = link->dump, .done = link->done, };