From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752195AbdLDXgW (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 18:36:22 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:60749 "EHLO out4-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752065AbdLDXgT (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 18:36:19 -0500 X-ME-Sender: Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 10:36:13 +1100 From: "Tobin C. Harding" To: kbuild test robot Cc: LKML Subject: running leaking_addresses.pl Message-ID: <20171204233613.GI21565@eros> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.24 (2015-08-30) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Recently scripts/leaking_addresses.pl was merged into the mainline with the hope of catching leaking kernel addresses. Would it be in scope for this script to be run by the kbuild test robot? Excuse my very little knowledge of the kbuild test robot but would this lead to the script being run on a number of kernels with varying configuration? In the event that this may be a possibility can I add that I do not have a suggestion for what to do with the output, can it go to LKML? I'm happy to be CC'd on the output to help investigate. thanks, Tobin.