Hi, On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 01:19:12PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On the A64, the MMC module clocks are fixed in the new timing mode, > i.e. they do not have a bit to select the mode. These clocks have > a 2x divider somewhere between the clock and the MMC module. > > To be consistent with other SoCs supporting the new timing mode, > we model the 2x divider as a fixed post-divider on the MMC module > clocks. > > This patch adds the post-dividers to the MMC clocks. > > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai I had a doubt applying that one... sorry. > --- > drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c > index 2bb4cabf802f..ee9c12cf3f08 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi-ng/ccu-sun50i-a64.c > @@ -400,28 +400,45 @@ static SUNXI_CCU_MP_WITH_MUX_GATE(nand_clk, "nand", mod0_default_parents, 0x080, > BIT(31), /* gate */ > 0); > > +/* > + * MMC clocks are the new timing mode (see A83T & H3) variety, but without > + * the mode switch. This means they have a 2x post divider between the clock > + * and the MMC module. This is not documented in the manual, but is taken > + * into consideration when setting the mmc module clocks in the BSP kernel. > + * Without it, MMC performance is degraded. > + * > + * We model it here to be consistent with other SoCs supporting this mode. > + * The alternative would be to add the 2x multiplier when setting the MMC > + * module clock in the MMC driver, just for the A64. > + */ > static const char * const mmc_default_parents[] = { "osc24M", "pll-periph0-2x", > "pll-periph1-2x" }; > -static SUNXI_CCU_MP_WITH_MUX_GATE(mmc0_clk, "mmc0", mmc_default_parents, 0x088, > - 0, 4, /* M */ > - 16, 2, /* P */ > - 24, 2, /* mux */ > - BIT(31), /* gate */ > - 0); > - > -static SUNXI_CCU_MP_WITH_MUX_GATE(mmc1_clk, "mmc1", mmc_default_parents, 0x08c, > - 0, 4, /* M */ > - 16, 2, /* P */ > - 24, 2, /* mux */ > - BIT(31), /* gate */ > - 0); > - > -static SUNXI_CCU_MP_WITH_MUX_GATE(mmc2_clk, "mmc2", mmc_default_parents, 0x090, > - 0, 4, /* M */ > - 16, 2, /* P */ > - 24, 2, /* mux */ > - BIT(31), /* gate */ > - 0); > +static SUNXI_CCU_MP_WITH_MUX_GATE_POSTDIV(mmc0_clk, "mmc0", > + mmc_default_parents, 0x088, > + 0, 4, /* M */ > + 16, 2, /* P */ > + 24, 2, /* mux */ > + BIT(31), /* gate */ > + 2, /* post-div */ > + 0); > + > +static SUNXI_CCU_MP_WITH_MUX_GATE_POSTDIV(mmc1_clk, "mmc1", > + mmc_default_parents, 0x08c, > + 0, 4, /* M */ > + 16, 2, /* P */ > + 24, 2, /* mux */ > + BIT(31), /* gate */ > + 2, /* post-div */ > + 0); > + Are you sure that the divider there for the non-eMMC clocks? Usually, the new mode is only here for the eMMC, so we would divide the rate by two in the non-eMMC case. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com