From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752325AbdLGEk1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2017 23:40:27 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f169.google.com ([209.85.192.169]:44581 "EHLO mail-pf0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752214AbdLGEkY (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Dec 2017 23:40:24 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYDFkwDNG+OX2/683QVe7om7f01z/TJ4NNsSqKLf2Kbi5h+K62Ey96HlUp5bpbe/tc3WW2y2w== Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 10:10:19 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Meelis Roos Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Rafael Wysocki , Linux PM , Vincent Guittot , "4 . 14+" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: longhaul: Set transition_delay_us to 20 ms Message-ID: <20171207044019.kxwusyl5qoxq7zta@vireshk-mac-ubuntu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06-12-17, 20:21, Meelis Roos wrote: > 30000 was not reliable. > > I created root cron job > @reboot sleep 120; /sbin/reboot > > and by the evening it was dead again. > > Will try 50000 tomorrow. Lets make it similar to what it was before my original patch modified it, to avoid all corner cases. Please test against 200 ms, 200000 value here. -- viresh