From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
To: Brice Goglin <brice.goglin@gmail.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <h.peter.anvin@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Sai Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>,
x86 <x86@kernel.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: Classify /proc/cpuinfo flag bits and add missing bits in documentation
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 17:22:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171211012252.GA65487@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3690e566-27df-9931-fb89-31c8e117a314@gmail.com>
On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 10:58:01PM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Le 09/12/2017 à 01:25, Fenghua Yu a écrit :
> > From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> >
> > With more flag bits in /proc/cpuinfo for RDT, it's better to classify the
> > bits for readability.
> >
> > Some previously missing bits are added as well.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt | 7 ++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt b/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt
> > index 6851854..9b62738 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt
> > @@ -7,7 +7,12 @@ Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> > Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@intel.com>
> >
> > This feature is enabled by the CONFIG_INTEL_RDT Kconfig and the
> > -X86 /proc/cpuinfo flag bits "rdt", "cqm", "cat_l3" and "cdp_l3".
> > +X86 /proc/cpuinfo flag bits:
> > +RDT (Resource Director Technology) Allocation - "rdt_a"
> > +CAT (Cache Allocation Technology) - "cat_l3", "cdp_l3", "cat_l2"
>
> Why not "Code and Data Prioritization" for cdp_l3?
CDP is an extension of CAT. So I just put cdp_l3 into the CAT class.
Thanks.
-Fenghua
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-11 1:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-09 0:25 [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: Classify /proc/cpuinfo flag bits and add missing bits in documentation Fenghua Yu
[not found] ` <3690e566-27df-9931-fb89-31c8e117a314@gmail.com>
2017-12-11 1:22 ` Fenghua Yu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171211012252.GA65487@linux.intel.com \
--to=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=brice.goglin@gmail.com \
--cc=h.peter.anvin@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).