From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752676AbdLKXrC (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:47:02 -0500 Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.131]:10670 "EHLO ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752066AbdLKXpp (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:45:45 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:38:35 +1100 From: Dave Chinner To: Joe Perches Cc: Alan Stern , Byungchul Park , "Theodore Ts'o" , Matthew Wilcox , Matthew Wilcox , Ross Zwisler , Jens Axboe , Rehas Sachdeva , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lge.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 72/73] xfs: Convert mru cache to XArray Message-ID: <20171211233835.GV5858@dastard> References: <20171208223654.GP5858@dastard> <1512838818.26342.7.camel@perches.com> <20171211214300.GT5858@dastard> <1513030348.3036.5.camel@perches.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1513030348.3036.5.camel@perches.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 02:12:28PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2017-12-12 at 08:43 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 09:00:18AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > > On Sat, 2017-12-09 at 09:36 +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > > 1. Using lockdep_set_novalidate_class() for anything other > > > > than device->mutex will throw checkpatch warnings. Nice. (*) > > > [] > > > > (*) checkpatch.pl is considered mostly harmful round here, too, > > > > but that's another rant.... > > > > > > How so? > > > > Short story is that it barfs all over the slightly non-standard > > coding style used in XFS. > [] > > This sort of stuff is just lowest-common-denominator noise - great > > for new code and/or inexperienced developers, but not for working > > with large bodies of existing code with slightly non-standard > > conventions. > > Completely reasonable. Thanks. > > Do you get many checkpatch submitters for fs/xfs? We used to. Not recently, though. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com