From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] futex: Check for uaddr alignment as early as possible
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 11:31:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171212103102.lzvchgpillhzomer@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1712121122160.1794@nanos>
* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Darren Hart wrote:
>
> > From: "Darren Hart (VMware)" <dvhart@infradead.org>
> >
> > uaddr alignment is currently tested by get_futex_key(). We can catch
> > misalignment earlier in sys_futex and return -EINVAL sooner. This
> > simplifies get_futex_key() a little, but more importantly exits the
> > kernel as soon as an invalid parameter is detected.
> >
> > Passes all selftests/futex testcases on a dual socket Xeon E5-2670, 16
> > physical cores total, 32 threads total.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Darren Hart (VMware) <dvhart@infradead.org>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
> > ---
> > kernel/futex.c | 7 +++++--
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> > index 76ed592..c3ee6c4 100644
> > --- a/kernel/futex.c
> > +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> > @@ -509,8 +509,6 @@ get_futex_key(u32 __user *uaddr, int fshared, union futex_key *key, int rw)
> > * The futex address must be "naturally" aligned.
> > */
> > key->both.offset = address % PAGE_SIZE;
> > - if (unlikely((address % sizeof(u32)) != 0))
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > address -= key->both.offset;
> >
> > if (unlikely(!access_ok(rw, uaddr, sizeof(u32))))
> > @@ -3525,6 +3523,11 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(futex, u32 __user *, uaddr, int, op, u32, val,
> > u32 val2 = 0;
> > int cmd = op & FUTEX_CMD_MASK;
> >
> > + /* Only allow for aligned uaddr variables */
> > + if (unlikely((unsigned long)uaddr % sizeof(u32) != 0 ||
> > + (unsigned long)uaddr2 % sizeof(u32) != 0))
>
> Errm. How is that supposed to work? uaddr2 is not used by all opcodes.....
So to explain the curious timing of the mails from Thomas and me: I told Thomas
about the breakage over IRC and he found the likely bug! ;-)
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-12 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-09 1:06 [PATCH] futex: Check for uaddr alignment as early as possible Darren Hart
2017-12-12 10:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-12-12 10:31 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2017-12-12 15:57 ` Darren Hart
2017-12-12 10:23 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171212103102.lzvchgpillhzomer@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).