linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, joseph.salisbury@canonical.com,
	edumazet@google.com, dvyukov@google.com, willemb@google.com,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, jakub.kicinski@netronome.com,
	linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, john.fastabend@gmail.com, me@tobin.cc,
	idosch@mellanox.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	1715609@bugs.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][4.13.y][4.14.y][v4.15.y] net: reduce skb_warn_bad_offload() noise
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 22:18:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171212211802.GC9919@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171212.091011.185992457624793318.davem@davemloft.net>

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 09:10:11AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:56:56 -0500
> 
> > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 04:25:26PM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> >>> Note that UFO was removed in 4.14 and that skb_warn_bad_offload
> >>> can happen for various types of packets, so there may be multiple
> >>> independent bug reports. I'm investigating two other non-UFO reports
> >>> just now.
> >>
> >> Meta-comment, now that UFO is gone from mainline, I'm wondering if I
> >> should just delete it from 4.4 and 4.9 as well.  Any objections for
> >> that?  I'd like to make it easy to maintain these kernels for a while,
> >> and having them diverge like this, with all of the issues around UFO,
> >> seems like it will just make life harder for myself if I leave it in.
> >>
> >> Any opinions?
> > 
> > Some of that removal had to be reverted with commit 0c19f846d582
> > ("net: accept UFO datagrams from tuntap and packet") for VM live
> > migration between kernels.
> > 
> > Any backports probably should squash that in at the least. Just today
> > another thread discussed that that patch may not address all open
> > issues still, so it may be premature to backport at this point.
> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<d71df64e-e65f-4db4-6f2e-c002c15fcbe4@01019freenet.de>
> 
> I would probably discourage backporting the UFO removal, at least for
> now.

Ok, thanks for letting me know, I'll ask again in 6 months or so :)

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-12 21:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-11 20:35 [REGRESSION][4.13.y][4.14.y][v4.15.y] net: reduce skb_warn_bad_offload() noise Joseph Salisbury
2017-12-11 21:25 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-12-11 21:44   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-12-11 21:56     ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-12-12 14:10       ` David Miller
2017-12-12 21:18         ` Greg KH [this message]
2017-12-11 21:28 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171212211802.GC9919@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=1715609@bugs.launchpad.net \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=idosch@mellanox.com \
    --cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=joseph.salisbury@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=me@tobin.cc \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).