linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
	Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@intel.com>,
	Yehezkel Bernat <yehezkel.bernat@intel.com>,
	Mario.Limonciello@dell.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] PCI: hotplug: Drop checking of PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL in *_unconfigure_device()
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 15:43:59 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171213214357.GI30595@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171109111508.47678-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 02:15:08PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> During PCIe surprise hot-unplug the device is not accessible anymore and
> register reads return 0xffffffff. When that happens pciehp_unconfigure_device()
> may inadvertently think the device below the bridge may be a display
> device of somesort as reading PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL register also returns
> 0xff. This results failure of the remove operation:
> 
>   pciehp 0000:00:1c.0:pcie004: Slot(0): Link Down
>   pciehp 0000:00:1c.0:pcie004: Slot(0): Card present
>   pciehp 0000:00:1c.0:pcie004: Cannot remove display device 0000:01:00.0
> 
> Because of this the hierarchy is left untouched preventing further
> hotplug operations.
> 
> Now, it is not clear why the check is there in the first place and why
> we would like to prevent removing a bridge if it has PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_VGA
> set. In case of PCIe surprise hot-unplug, it would not even be possible
> to prevent the removal.
> 
> Given this and the issue described above, I think it makes sense to drop
> the whole PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL check from pciehp_unconfigure_device().
> While there do the same for shpchp_configure_device() based on the same
> reasoning and the fact that the same bug might trigger in standard PCI
> hotplug as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

Applied to pci/hotplug for v4.16, thanks!

> ---
> The previous version (v4) of the patch can be found here:
> 
>   https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10026551/
> 
> Changes from v4:
> 
>   - Drop the check from shpchp_configure_device() as well
> 
>  drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_pci.c | 12 ------------
>  drivers/pci/hotplug/shpchp_pci.c | 12 ------------
>  2 files changed, 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_pci.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_pci.c
> index 2a1ca020cf5a..acc360d1a1fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_pci.c
> @@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ int pciehp_configure_device(struct slot *p_slot)
>  int pciehp_unconfigure_device(struct slot *p_slot)
>  {
>  	int rc = 0;
> -	u8 bctl = 0;
>  	u8 presence = 0;
>  	struct pci_dev *dev, *temp;
>  	struct pci_bus *parent = p_slot->ctrl->pcie->port->subordinate;
> @@ -101,17 +100,6 @@ int pciehp_unconfigure_device(struct slot *p_slot)
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(dev, temp, &parent->devices,
>  					 bus_list) {
>  		pci_dev_get(dev);
> -		if (dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE && presence) {
> -			pci_read_config_byte(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, &bctl);
> -			if (bctl & PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_VGA) {
> -				ctrl_err(ctrl,
> -					 "Cannot remove display device %s\n",
> -					 pci_name(dev));
> -				pci_dev_put(dev);
> -				rc = -EINVAL;
> -				break;
> -			}
> -		}
>  		if (!presence) {
>  			pci_dev_set_disconnected(dev, NULL);
>  			if (pci_has_subordinate(dev))
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/shpchp_pci.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/shpchp_pci.c
> index ea63db58b4b1..79f1682c858e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/shpchp_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/shpchp_pci.c
> @@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ int shpchp_configure_device(struct slot *p_slot)
>  int shpchp_unconfigure_device(struct slot *p_slot)
>  {
>  	int rc = 0;
> -	u8 bctl = 0;
>  	struct pci_bus *parent = p_slot->ctrl->pci_dev->subordinate;
>  	struct pci_dev *dev, *temp;
>  	struct controller *ctrl = p_slot->ctrl;
> @@ -93,17 +92,6 @@ int shpchp_unconfigure_device(struct slot *p_slot)
>  			continue;
>  
>  		pci_dev_get(dev);
> -		if (dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE) {
> -			pci_read_config_byte(dev, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, &bctl);
> -			if (bctl & PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_VGA) {
> -				ctrl_err(ctrl,
> -					 "Cannot remove display device %s\n",
> -					 pci_name(dev));
> -				pci_dev_put(dev);
> -				rc = -EINVAL;
> -				break;
> -			}
> -		}
>  		pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device(dev);
>  		pci_dev_put(dev);
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.14.2
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-12-13 21:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-09 11:15 [PATCH v5] PCI: hotplug: Drop checking of PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL in *_unconfigure_device() Mika Westerberg
2017-12-05 10:11 ` Mika Westerberg
2017-12-13 21:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171213214357.GI30595@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=Mario.Limonciello@dell.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=michael.jamet@intel.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=yehezkel.bernat@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).