From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751583AbdLNIBe (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Dec 2017 03:01:34 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:57196 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750729AbdLNIBd (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Dec 2017 03:01:33 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 09:01:36 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Naresh Kamboju Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Ben Hutchings , Shuah Khan , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, patches@kernelci.org, linux- stable , akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Guenter Roeck , Tom Gall Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 000/164] 4.14.6-stable review Message-ID: <20171214080136.GC2965@kroah.com> References: <20171212123443.785979602@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:45:39PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On 12 December 2017 at 18:13, Greg Kroah-Hartman > wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.6 release. > > There are 164 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Thu Dec 14 12:34:08 UTC 2017. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.14.6-rc1.gz > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.14.y > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > Results from Linaro’s test farm. > No regressions on arm64 and x86_64. > armv7 beagleboard x15 results are not available due to infrastructure issues. > > Note: > Newly added selftests/net/reuseport_bpf FAILED in full run on x86_64 and > the independent test execution resulted as PASS. That's odd, it's not good when test infrastructure doesn't work :( Anyway, thanks for testing and letting me know. greg k-h