linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] certs: always use secondary keyring first if possible
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 18:25:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171214102513.GA2371@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171118044711.GA7352@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>

On 11/18/17 at 12:47pm, Dave Young wrote:
> Commit d3bfe84129f6 introduced secondary_trusted_keys keyring, current
> users of verify_pkcs7_signature are below:
> net/wireless/reg.c : uses its own trusted_keys
> kernel/module_signing.c : pass NULL trusted_keys 
> crypto/asymmetric_keys/verify_pefile.c : pass NULL trusted_keys
> 
> For both module and pefile verification, there is no reason to use builtin
> keys only. Actually in Fedora kernel module signing code passes 1UL, but
> kexec code does not pass 1UL for pefile verification thus we have below bug
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470995
> 
> Drop the hard code 1UL checking so that pefile verification can use
> secondary keyring as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
> ---
>  certs/system_keyring.c |    2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> --- linux-x86.orig/certs/system_keyring.c
> +++ linux-x86/certs/system_keyring.c
> @@ -229,8 +229,6 @@ int verify_pkcs7_signature(const void *d
>  		goto error;
>  
>  	if (!trusted_keys) {
> -		trusted_keys = builtin_trusted_keys;
> -	} else if (trusted_keys == (void *)1UL) {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SECONDARY_TRUSTED_KEYRING
>  		trusted_keys = secondary_trusted_keys;
>  #else

Another ping.

If the (-1UL) is really needed, below file need update to use it
But I think it is ugly..
crypto/asymmetric_keys/verify_pefile.c

Thanks
Dave

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-12-14 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-18  4:47 [PATCH] certs: always use secondary keyring first if possible Dave Young
2017-11-29  2:15 ` Dave Young
2017-12-14 10:25 ` Dave Young [this message]
2018-06-08  7:28   ` Dave Young
2018-06-08  8:53     ` Dave Young

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171214102513.GA2371@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com \
    --to=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).