From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753922AbdLNWWy (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Dec 2017 17:22:54 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:58920 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753301AbdLNWWt (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Dec 2017 17:22:49 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 23:22:48 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andy Lutomirski , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andrew Lutomirski , Zhang Rui , Thomas Gleixner , Jarkko Nikula , Linux Kernel Mailing List , the arch/x86 maintainers Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix resume on x86-32 machines Message-ID: <20171214222248.GA784@amd> References: <2809506.pL8kVbvXcY@aspire.rjw.lan> <20171210213804.GA4660@amd> <76028A95-1CE1-49AA-9929-9C15FFC520EB@amacapital.net> <151331264.Sjvx2oHGGq@aspire.rjw.lan> <20171214203815.GA29972@amd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu 2017-12-14 12:47:56, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > But given this is already "regression fix for x86-64 caused regression > > on x86-32", I really believe we should merge trivial fix now, and do > > the cleanups / nicer fixes sometime later? >=20 > The fix patch was already posted, but in another thread (confusingly > with _almost_ the same subject: "Re: Linux 4.15-rc2: Regression in > resume from ACPI S3"). >=20 > Here: >=20 > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/luto/linux.git/commit/?= h=3Dx86/fixes >=20 > but it hasn't actually gotten to me yet (I think Luto made a new > version where he split it up into three smaller patches, and I'm > assuming it's in one of the -tip trees heading for me asap). Ok.. It did not apply cleanly. ... but I see fresh patches in my inbox, let me test those. Best regards, Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAloy+bgACgkQMOfwapXb+vL3OgCgmYIy2fLnVNMhD5TSEAZhXQOt qncAoL32XQ+wCIazTAXnn8NUxUfrblMq =R/SK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs--