From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755372AbdLOMDW (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Dec 2017 07:03:22 -0500 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:63032 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753443AbdLOMDU (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Dec 2017 07:03:20 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,404,1508828400"; d="scan'208";a="2953151" Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 14:03:03 +0200 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Gunthorpe , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, Peter Huewe Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: remove type and name fields from the I2C Infineon OF table entries Message-ID: <20171215120303.v3jh6g43lgktaykp@linux.intel.com> References: <20171204173916.4874-1-javierm@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171204173916.4874-1-javierm@redhat.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Some basic questions about DT, which I'm not expert of. On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 06:39:16PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > The commit 21dc02eab989 ("tpm/tpm_i2c_infineon.c: Add OF attributes type > and name to the of_device_id table entries") added type and name fields > to the OF device ID table entries for the I2C Infineon TPM driver. > > The only justification for the change in the commit message is that it's > probably a good idea to have these fields populated in the OF entries. > > But I don't think that's true. In fact, I believe that's not correct to > add these fields for the following reasons: > > * The struct of_device_id .type field matches the device_type property > in the Device Tree nodes. The ePAPR document says that new use of the > property is deprecated and should only be included in cpu and memory > nodes for compatibility with the IEEE 1275-derived Device Trees. > Also, mainline Device Tree source files don't include this property > in the TPM nodes defined. > > * The struct of_device_id .name field matches the Device Tree node name > but the ePAPR document says that the node name should be generic and > reflect the function of the device, not it's programming model. So in > the case of TPM chips, it should just be "tpm" but the name fields are > set in the OF table entries to the actual device model (i.e: slb9645tt). So why the name field is not changed to "tpm"? > Now, from a practical point of view this means that the OF module aliases > for the supported devices include the name and type of the device entries: > > $ modinfo drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_infineon.ko | grep alias > alias: of:Nslb9645ttTtpm*Cinfineon,slb9645ttC* > alias: of:Nslb9645ttTtpm*Cinfineon,slb9645tt > alias: of:Nslb9635ttTtpm*Cinfineon,slb9635ttC* > alias: of:Nslb9635ttTtpm*Cinfineon,slb9635tt > alias: of:Ntpm_i2c_infineonTtpm*Cinfineon,tpm_i2c_infineonC* > alias: of:Ntpm_i2c_infineonTtpm*Cinfineon,tpm_i2c_infineon > > But since the device_type isn't set in the tpm DT nodes and the node name > is a generic one, the reported MODALIAS when a device is registered via OF > won't match the driver's module aliases: > > $ cat /sys/class/tpm/tpm0/device/modalias > of:NtpmTCinfineon,slb9645tt > > So remove these fields from the OF entries to allow the module aliases to > match the MODALIAS reported by the kernel when the device is registered: > > $ modinfo drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_infineon.ko | grep alias > alias: of:N*T*Cinfineon,slb9645ttC* > alias: of:N*T*Cinfineon,slb9645tt > alias: of:N*T*Cinfineon,slb9635ttC* > alias: of:N*T*Cinfineon,slb9635tt > alias: of:N*T*Cinfineon,tpm_i2c_infineonC* > alias: of:N*T*Cinfineon,tpm_i2c_infineon > > Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas > --- > > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_infineon.c | 21 +++------------------ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_infineon.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_infineon.c > index 79d6bbb58e39..005c38879b2e 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_infineon.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_i2c_infineon.c > @@ -675,24 +675,9 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, tpm_tis_i2c_table); > > #ifdef CONFIG_OF > static const struct of_device_id tpm_tis_i2c_of_match[] = { > - { > - .name = "tpm_i2c_infineon", > - .type = "tpm", > - .compatible = "infineon,tpm_i2c_infineon", > - .data = (void *)0 > - }, > - { > - .name = "slb9635tt", > - .type = "tpm", > - .compatible = "infineon,slb9635tt", > - .data = (void *)0 > - }, > - { > - .name = "slb9645tt", > - .type = "tpm", > - .compatible = "infineon,slb9645tt", > - .data = (void *)1 > - }, > + { .compatible = "infineon,tpm_i2c_infineon", .data = (void *)0 }, > + { .compatible = "infineon,slb9635tt", .data = (void *)0 }, > + { .compatible = "infineon,slb9645tt", .data = (void *)1 }, > {}, > }; > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tpm_tis_i2c_of_match); > -- > 2.14.3 > What does the "data" field mean? /Jarkko