linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: joro@8bytes.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
	Jayachandran.Nair@cavium.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Ganapatrao.Kulkarni@cavium.com, mw@semihalf.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 1/1] iommu: Make sure device's ID array elements are unique
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 09:37:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171219093726.432e16e7@t450s.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1513696821-32291-1-git-send-email-tomasz.nowicki@caviumnetworks.com>

On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 16:20:21 +0100
Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:

> While iterating over DMA aliases for a PCI device, for some rare cases
> (i.e. PCIe-to-PCI/X bridges) we may get exactly the same ID as initial child
> device. In turn, the same ID may get registered for a device multiple times.
> Eventually IOMMU  driver may try to configure the same ID within domain
> multiple times too which for some IOMMU drivers is illegal and causes kernel
> panic.
> 
> Rule out ID duplication prior to device ID array registration.
> 
> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org	# v4.14+

You've identified a release, is there a specific commit this fixes?

> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@caviumnetworks.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index 3de5c0b..9b2c138 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -1945,6 +1945,31 @@ void iommu_fwspec_free(struct device *dev)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_fwspec_free);
>  
> +static void iommu_fwspec_remove_ids_dup(struct device *dev, u32 *ids,
> +					int *num_ids)
> +{
> +	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev->iommu_fwspec;
> +	int i, j, k, valid_ids = *num_ids;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < valid_ids; i++) {
> +		for (j = 0; j < fwspec->num_ids; j++) {
> +			if (ids[i] != fwspec->ids[j])
> +				continue;
> +
> +			dev_info(dev, "found 0x%x ID duplication, skipped\n",
> +				 ids[i]);
> +
> +			for (k = i + 1; k < valid_ids; k++)
> +				ids[k - 1] = ids[k];

Use memmove()?

> +
> +			valid_ids--;
> +			break;

At this point ids[i] is not the ids[i] that we tested for dupes, it's
what was ids[i + 1], but we're going to i++ on the next iteration and
we therefore never test that entry.

> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	*num_ids = valid_ids;
> +}
> +
>  int iommu_fwspec_add_ids(struct device *dev, u32 *ids, int num_ids)
>  {
>  	struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev->iommu_fwspec;
> @@ -1954,6 +1979,9 @@ int iommu_fwspec_add_ids(struct device *dev, u32 *ids, int num_ids)
>  	if (!fwspec)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	/* Rule out IDs already registered */
> +	iommu_fwspec_remove_ids_dup(dev, ids, &num_ids);
> +
>  	size = offsetof(struct iommu_fwspec, ids[fwspec->num_ids + num_ids]);
>  	if (size > sizeof(*fwspec)) {
>  		fwspec = krealloc(dev->iommu_fwspec, size, GFP_KERNEL);

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-19 16:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-19 15:13 [PATCH V1 0/1] Fix kernel panic caused by device ID duplication presented to the IOMMU Tomasz Nowicki
2017-12-19 15:20 ` [PATCH V1 1/1] iommu: Make sure device's ID array elements are unique Tomasz Nowicki
2017-12-19 16:37   ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2017-12-20 10:28     ` Tomasz Nowicki
2017-12-19 16:34 ` [PATCH V1 0/1] Fix kernel panic caused by device ID duplication presented to the IOMMU Robin Murphy
2017-12-20 10:27   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2017-12-22 11:29   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2017-12-27 19:34   ` Jayachandran C

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171219093726.432e16e7@t450s.home \
    --to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=Ganapatrao.Kulkarni@cavium.com \
    --cc=Jayachandran.Nair@cavium.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mw@semihalf.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tomasz.nowicki@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).