From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751824AbdL0DKv (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Dec 2017 22:10:51 -0500 Received: from mail-pl0-f65.google.com ([209.85.160.65]:45177 "EHLO mail-pl0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751225AbdL0DKs (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Dec 2017 22:10:48 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBou7NyvMOJW4+pgq6/gUEXcoVsPwq9T5hmaJYIYk5vwcFKbvqnPXgSoNvICujV4PFQpQWVt4WA== Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 10:54:01 +0800 From: Peng Fan To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ulf Hansson , Russell King - ARM Linux , Haibo Chen , linux-mmc , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Jon Hunter , aisheng.dong@nxp.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: disable irq in sdhci host suspend ranther than free this irq Message-ID: <20171227025401.GA28360@shlinux2> References: <1453974146-20951-1-git-send-email-haibo.chen@nxp.com> <20160128102057.GJ10826@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi All, Sorry for bring back this old topic again. On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 05:27:46PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >On Thu, 28 Jan 2016, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> On Thu, 28 Jan 2016, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> > Therefore, the only way we currently can make sure to don't get the >> > IRQ is to free and later re-request it. Now, apparently that has >> > issues when using threaded IRQ handlers. >> >> What's the issue? > >Ah, you mean that one: > >> Currently sdhci driver free irq in host suspend, and call >> request_threaded_irq() in host resume. But during host resume, >> Ctrl+C can impact sdhci host resume, see the error log: > >> CPU1 is up >> PM: noirq resume of devices complete after 0.637 msecs imx-sdma 30bd0000.sdma: loaded firmware 4.1 >> PM: early resume of devices complete after 0.774 msecs >> dpm_run_callback(): platform_pm_resume+0x0/0x44 returns -4 >> PM: Device 30b40000.usdhc failed to resume: error -4 >> dpm_run_callback(): platform_pm_resume+0x0/0x44 returns -4 >> PM: Device 30b50000.usdhc failed to resume: error -4 >> dpm_run_callback(): platform_pm_resume+0x0/0x44 returns -4 >> PM: Device 30b60000.usdhc failed to resume: error -4 fec 30be0000.ethernet eth0: Link is Up - 100Mbps/Full - flow control rx/tx >> mmc0: Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt. >> mmc0: Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt. >> mmc0: Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt. >> mmc0: Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt. >> mmc0: Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt. >> mmc0: Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt. >> mmc0: error -110 during resume (card was removed?) >> mmc2: Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt. >> mmc2: Timeout waiting for hardware interrupt. >> mmc2: error -110 during resume (card was removed?) > >In request_threaded_irq-> __setup_irq-> kthread_create >->kthread_create_on_node, the comment shows that SIGKILLed will >impact the kthread create, and return -EINTR. > >And how should that thread be SIGKILLed? Hitting Ctrl+C on the console does >not affect any kernel internal thread. Hitting Ctrl+C affects solely the >process which is running on that console. > >And if it would, then that would be a completely different, serious bug which >needs to be fixed. > >How was verified, that the thread was not created and that the creation failed >due to a SIGKILL? This is the testcase. "/unit_tests/SRTC/rtcwakeup.out -d rtc0 -m mem -s 2;" it acts "echo mem > /sys/power/state", then rtc interrupt will wakeup the system. My understanding is: The issue is during suspend resume, it is in rtwakeup.out process space, during resume, "get_current()->comm" shows "rtcwakeup.out", so if we send SIGKILL from userspace, a interrupt will occur, interrupt handler will directly return to kernel space to continue resuming. __setup_irq->kthread_create->wait_for_completion_killable, here wait_for_completion_killable see SIGKILL pending and return -EINTR, then sdhci resume process failure, because of sdhci interrupt thread not created. During suspend/resume, OOM Killer will be disabled and enalbed. When request_threaded_irq in sdhci resume, OOM Killer is still disabled. According to kthread_create comments for wait_for_completion_killable, using killable is to catch OOM sigkill. But during resume, OOM Killer is disabled, So how about the following patch to disable SIGKILL for a short while? diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c index e9290a3439d5..84c4c99b1acb 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -2895,9 +2896,11 @@ int sdhci_resume_host(struct sdhci_host *host) } if (!device_may_wakeup(mmc_dev(host->mmc))) { + disallow_signal(SIGKILL); ret = request_threaded_irq(host->irq, sdhci_irq, sdhci_thread_irq, IRQF_SHARED, mmc_hostname(host->mmc), host); + allow_signal(SIGKILL); if (ret) return ret; } else { Thanks, Peng. > >Thanks, > > tglx --