From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751302AbeADXNK (ORCPT <rfc822;ralf@linux-mips.org> + 1 other);
        Thu, 4 Jan 2018 18:13:10 -0500
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:33999 "EHLO
        bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751029AbeADXNJ (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 4 Jan 2018 18:13:09 -0500
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 15:13:07 -0800
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Rao Shoaib <rao.shoaib@oracle.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, brouer@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Move kfree_call_rcu() to slab_common.c
Message-ID: <20180104231307.GA794@bombadil.infradead.org>
References: <1514923898-2495-1-git-send-email-rao.shoaib@oracle.com>
 <20180102222341.GB20405@bombadil.infradead.org>
 <3be609d4-800e-a89e-f885-7e0f5d288862@oracle.com>
 <20180104013807.GA31392@tardis>
 <be1abd24-56c8-45bc-fecc-3f0c5b978678@oracle.com>
 <64ca3929-4044-9393-a6ca-70c0a2589a35@oracle.com>
 <20180104214658.GA20740@bombadil.infradead.org>
 <3e4ea0b9-686f-7e36-d80c-8577401517e2@oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <3e4ea0b9-686f-7e36-d80c-8577401517e2@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 02:18:50PM -0800, Rao Shoaib wrote:
> > > > > +#define kfree_rcu(ptr, rcu_head_name) \
> > > > > +    do { \
> > > > > +        typeof(ptr) __ptr = ptr;    \
> > > > > +        unsigned long __off = offsetof(typeof(*(__ptr)), \
> > > > > +                              rcu_head_name); \
> > > > > +        struct rcu_head *__rptr = (void *)__ptr + __off; \
> > > > > +        __kfree_rcu(__rptr, __off); \
> > > > > +    } while (0)
> > > > why do you want to open code this?
> > But why are you changing this macro at all?  If it was to avoid the
> > double-mention of "ptr", then you haven't done that.
> I have -- I do not get the error because ptr is being assigned only one. If
> you have a better way than let me know and I will be happy to make the
> change.

But look at the original:

#define kfree_rcu(ptr, rcu_head)                                        \
        __kfree_rcu(&((ptr)->rcu_head), offsetof(typeof(*(ptr)), rcu_head))
                       ^^^                                ^^^

versus your version:

+#define kfree_rcu(ptr, rcu_head_name) \
+    do { \
+        typeof(ptr) __ptr = ptr;    \
                ^^^          ^^^
+        unsigned long __off = offsetof(typeof(*(__ptr)), \
+                              rcu_head_name); \
+        struct rcu_head *__rptr = (void *)__ptr + __off; \
+        __kfree_rcu(__rptr, __off); \
+    } while (0)

I don't see the difference.