From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Prateek Sood <prsood@codeaurora.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
avagin@gmail.com, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, sramana@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: fix circular locking dependency
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 05:44:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180109134448.GE3668920@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180109042016.GR9671@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Hello, Paul.
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 08:20:16PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> OK, so I can put WQ_MEM_RECLAIM on the early boot creation of RCU's
> workqueue_struct as shown below, right?
Yes, this looks good to me. Just one question.
> +struct workqueue_struct *rcu_gp_workqueue;
> +
> void __init rcu_init(void)
> {
> int cpu;
> @@ -4298,6 +4300,10 @@ void __init rcu_init(void)
> rcu_cpu_starting(cpu);
> rcutree_online_cpu(cpu);
> }
> +
> + /* Create workqueue for expedited GPs and for Tree SRCU. */
> + rcu_gp_workqueue = alloc_workqueue("rcu_gp", WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
> + WARN_ON(!rcu_gp_workqueue);
The code was previously using both system_power_efficient_wq and
system_workqueue (for the expedited path). I guess the options were
either using two workqueues or dropping POWER_EFFICIENT. I have no
idea how big an impact this will make or whether it'd even be
noticeable but maybe it'd be worthwhile to mention that in the
description?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-09 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CANaxB-zT+sz=z1FFk5npnwMySdfKCBZDkM+P+=JXDkCXbh=rCw@mail.gmail.com>
2017-11-28 11:35 ` [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: fix circular locking dependency Prateek Sood
2017-12-04 5:14 ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-04 20:22 ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-04 22:58 ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-04 23:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-08 9:40 ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-08 11:45 ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-11 15:32 ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-13 14:28 ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-13 15:40 ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-15 8:54 ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-15 13:22 ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-15 19:06 ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-19 7:26 ` [PATCH] cgroup: Fix deadlock in cpu hotplug path Prateek Sood
2017-12-19 13:39 ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-11 15:20 ` [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: fix circular locking dependency Tejun Heo
2017-12-13 7:50 ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-13 16:06 ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-15 19:04 ` Prateek Sood
2017-12-28 20:37 ` Prateek Sood
2018-01-02 16:16 ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-02 17:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-02 18:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-08 12:28 ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 13:47 ` [PATCH wq/for-4.16 1/2] workqueue: separate out init_rescuer() Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 13:47 ` [PATCH wq/for-4.16 2/2] workqueue: allow WQ_MEM_RECLAIM on early init workqueues Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 22:52 ` [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: fix circular locking dependency Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-09 0:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-09 3:42 ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-09 4:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-09 13:44 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2018-01-09 15:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-09 15:37 ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-09 16:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-10 20:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-10 21:41 ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-10 22:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-15 12:02 ` Prateek Sood
2018-01-16 16:27 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180109134448.GE3668920@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=avagin@gmail.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=prsood@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sramana@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).