From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935035AbeAOOUP (ORCPT + 1 other); Mon, 15 Jan 2018 09:20:15 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:46160 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965481AbeAOMjN (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jan 2018 07:39:13 -0500 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Andrey Ryabinin , Wu Fengguang , Tejun Heo , Andy Shevchenko , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Mel Gorman Subject: [PATCH 4.4 27/87] mm/page-writeback: fix dirty_ratelimit calculation Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 13:34:26 +0100 Message-Id: <20180115123351.985537051@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.15.1 In-Reply-To: <20180115123349.252309699@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180115123349.252309699@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Andrey Ryabinin commit d59b1087a98e402ed9a7cc577f4da435f9a555f5 upstream. Calculation of dirty_ratelimit sometimes is not correct. E.g. initial values of dirty_ratelimit == INIT_BW and step == 0, lead to the following result: UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in ../mm/page-writeback.c:1286:7 shift exponent 25600 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int' The fix is straightforward - make step 0 if the shift exponent is too big. Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin Cc: Wu Fengguang Cc: Tejun Heo Cc: Andy Shevchenko Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- mm/page-writeback.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- a/mm/page-writeback.c +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c @@ -1162,6 +1162,7 @@ static void wb_update_dirty_ratelimit(st unsigned long balanced_dirty_ratelimit; unsigned long step; unsigned long x; + unsigned long shift; /* * The dirty rate will match the writeout rate in long term, except @@ -1286,11 +1287,11 @@ static void wb_update_dirty_ratelimit(st * rate itself is constantly fluctuating. So decrease the track speed * when it gets close to the target. Helps eliminate pointless tremors. */ - step >>= dirty_ratelimit / (2 * step + 1); - /* - * Limit the tracking speed to avoid overshooting. - */ - step = (step + 7) / 8; + shift = dirty_ratelimit / (2 * step + 1); + if (shift < BITS_PER_LONG) + step = DIV_ROUND_UP(step >> shift, 8); + else + step = 0; if (dirty_ratelimit < balanced_dirty_ratelimit) dirty_ratelimit += step;