From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/24] x86,kvm: Fix indirect calls in emulator
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 10:34:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180125093453.GX2228@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9fe90910-7908-f570-0088-568213f52a78@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:43:05AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 24/01/2018 11:35, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 08:48:13PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 21:28 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> flags = (flags & EFLAGS_MASK) | X86_EFLAGS_IF;
> >>>> - asm("push %[flags]; popf; call *%[fastop]"
> >>>> - : "=a"(rc) : [fastop]"r"(fop), [flags]"r"(flags));
> >>>> + asm("push %[flags]; popf; " CALL_NOSPEC
> >>>> + : "=a"(rc) : [thunk_target]"r"(fop), [flags]"r"(flags));
> >>>
> >>> Oh, "thunk_target" is magical.
> >>
> >> You can use THUNK_TARGET(fop), which will be "rm" on 32-bit and avoids
> >> register starvation in some cases (I don't think the hyperv calls
> >> worked until I did that).
> >
> > The reason I didn't use THUNK_TARGET() was exactly because it used "rm"
> > and the current code did "r" only. I'm happy to change if people can
> > agree on something ;-)
>
> In practice, "fastop" is going to be in a register because of how it's
> computed, but "rm" is okay.
OK, so the other occurence in that file uses "+S", which is the SI
register. That cannot use THUNK_TARGET(), right?
So do you want one THUNK_TARGET and one open coded, or keep the patch as
is (both open coded) ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-25 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-23 15:25 [PATCH 00/24] objtool: retpoline and asm-goto validation Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-23 15:25 ` [PATCH 01/24] objtool: Use existing global variables for options Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-23 15:25 ` [PATCH 02/24] objtool: Add retpoline validation Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-23 18:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-26 9:54 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-23 15:25 ` [PATCH 03/24] x86/paravirt: Annotate indirect calls Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-25 10:02 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-25 10:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-25 10:26 ` Juergen Gross
2018-01-25 10:52 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-25 11:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-26 9:57 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-29 17:58 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-29 18:09 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-29 18:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-29 18:38 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-29 19:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-30 16:02 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-31 4:13 ` [PATCH] x86/paravirt: Remove 'noreplace-paravirt' cmdline option Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-31 5:59 ` Juergen Gross
2018-01-31 9:42 ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-23 15:25 ` [PATCH 04/24] x86,nospec: Annotate indirect calls/jumps Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-26 10:19 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-29 17:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-23 15:25 ` [PATCH 05/24] x86: Annotate indirect jump in head_64.S Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-26 10:24 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-23 15:25 ` [PATCH 06/24] x86,kvm: Fix indirect calls in emulator Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-23 20:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-23 20:48 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-24 10:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-24 10:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-25 9:34 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-01-25 9:49 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-26 10:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-23 15:25 ` [PATCH 07/24] x86,vmx: Fix indirect call Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-25 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-23 15:25 ` [PATCH 08/24] x86,sme: Annotate " Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-26 10:37 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-29 17:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-29 17:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-31 9:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-31 15:04 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-31 16:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-23 15:25 ` [PATCH 09/24] jump_label: Add branch hints to static_branch_{un,}likely() Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-24 18:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-23 15:25 ` [PATCH 10/24] sched: Optimize ttwu_stat() Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-23 15:25 ` [PATCH 11/24] x86: Reindent _static_cpu_has Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-23 15:25 ` [PATCH 12/24] x86: Update _static_cpu_has to use all named variables Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-25 19:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-23 15:25 ` [PATCH 13/24] objtool: Implement base jump_assert support Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-26 10:45 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-23 15:25 ` [PATCH 14/24] x86: Add a type field to alt_instr Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-23 15:25 ` [PATCH 15/24] x86: Annotate static_cpu_has alternative Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-23 15:25 ` [PATCH 16/24] objtool: Implement jump_assert for _static_cpu_has() Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-23 15:25 ` [PATCH 17/24] objtool: Introduce special_type Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-23 15:25 ` [PATCH 18/24] objtool: More complex static jump implementation Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-23 15:25 ` [PATCH 19/24] objtool: Even more complex static block checks Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-23 15:25 ` [PATCH 20/24] objtool: Another static block fail Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-29 22:52 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-30 9:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-31 3:12 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-31 10:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-31 10:07 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-31 10:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-23 15:26 ` [PATCH 21/24] objtool: Skip static assert when KCOV/KASAN Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-23 15:26 ` [PATCH 22/24] x86/jump_label: Implement arch_static_assert() Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-23 15:26 ` [PATCH 23/24] x86: Force asm-goto Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-23 15:26 ` [PATCH 24/24] x86: Remove FAST_FEATURE_TESTS Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-23 15:42 ` [PATCH 00/24] objtool: retpoline and asm-goto validation Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-23 15:57 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-23 16:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180125093453.GX2228@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).