linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>,
	hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dwmw@amazon.co.uk,
	linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: hpwdt: Remove spinlock acquire and BIOS calls from NMI context
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 10:44:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180214094404.GA18349@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180214093159.mdzfupne547bi5qx@gmail.com>

+ Jerry

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:31:59AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > Dave Hansen and I had some discussions on how to handle the nested NMI and 
> > firmware calls.  We thought of using a per cpu counter to record the nesting 
> > call depth and toggle IBRS appropriately for the depth 0->1 and 1->0 transition.  
> > Will this change be sufficient?
> 
> Yeah, so I think the first question should be: does the firmware call from NMI 
> context make sense to begin with?
> 
> Because in this particular case it does not appear to be so: the reason for the 
> BIOS/firmware call appears to be to determine how we nmi_panic() after receiving 
> an NMI that no other NMI handler handled: with a passive-aggressive "I don't know" 
> panic message or with a slightly more informative panic message.
> 
> That's not a real value-add to users - so we can avoid all these complications by 
> applying the patch below:
> 
>  drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.c | 30 ++++--------------------------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> As a bonus the spinlock use can be removed as well.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo
> 
> ====================>
> From b038428a739a3fcf0b9678305c131f60af7422ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 10:24:41 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] watchdog: hpwdt: Remove spinlock acquire and BIOS calls from
>  NMI context
> 
> Taking a spinlock and calling into the firmware are problematic things to
> do from NMI callbacks.
> 
> It also seems completely pointless in this particular case:
> 
>  - cmn_regs is updated by the firmware call in the hpwdt_pretimeout() NMI
>    callback, but there's almost no use for it: we use it only to determine
>    whether to panic with an 'unknown NMI' or a slightly more descriptive
>    message.
> 
>  - cmn_regs and rom_lock is not used anywhere else, other than early detection
>    of the firmware capability.
> 
> So remove rom_lock, make the cmn_regs call from the detection routine only,
> and thus make the NMI callback a lot more robust.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.c | 30 ++++--------------------------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.c
> index f1f00dfc0e68..2544fe482fe3 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/hpwdt.c
> @@ -150,9 +150,7 @@ static unsigned int hpwdt_nmi_decoding;
>  static unsigned int allow_kdump = 1;
>  static unsigned int is_icru;
>  static unsigned int is_uefi;
> -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(rom_lock);
>  static void *cru_rom_addr;
> -static struct cmn_registers cmn_regs;
>  
>  extern asmlinkage void asminline_call(struct cmn_registers *pi86Regs,
>  						unsigned long *pRomEntry);
> @@ -225,6 +223,7 @@ static int cru_detect(unsigned long map_entry,
>  	unsigned long physical_bios_base = 0;
>  	unsigned long physical_bios_offset = 0;
>  	int retval = -ENODEV;
> +	struct cmn_registers cmn_regs = { };
>  
>  	bios32_map = ioremap(map_entry, (2 * PAGE_SIZE));
>  
> @@ -486,32 +485,18 @@ static int hpwdt_my_nmi(void)
>   */
>  static int hpwdt_pretimeout(unsigned int ulReason, struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
> -	unsigned long rom_pl;
> -	static int die_nmi_called;
> -
>  	if (!hpwdt_nmi_decoding)
>  		return NMI_DONE;
>  
>  	if ((ulReason == NMI_UNKNOWN) && !hpwdt_my_nmi())
>  		return NMI_DONE;
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&rom_lock, rom_pl);
> -	if (!die_nmi_called && !is_icru && !is_uefi)
> -		asminline_call(&cmn_regs, cru_rom_addr);
> -	die_nmi_called = 1;
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rom_lock, rom_pl);
> -
>  	if (allow_kdump)
>  		hpwdt_stop();
>  
> -	if (!is_icru && !is_uefi) {
> -		if (cmn_regs.u1.ral == 0) {
> -			nmi_panic(regs, "An NMI occurred, but unable to determine source.\n");
> -			return NMI_HANDLED;
> -		}
> -	}
> -	nmi_panic(regs, "An NMI occurred. Depending on your system the reason "
> -		"for the NMI is logged in any one of the following "
> +	nmi_panic(regs,
> +		"An NMI occurred. Depending on your system the reason "
> +		"for the NMI might be logged in any one of the following "
>  		"resources:\n"
>  		"1. Integrated Management Log (IML)\n"
>  		"2. OA Syslog\n"
> @@ -744,13 +729,6 @@ static int hpwdt_init_nmi_decoding(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  				HPWDT_ARCH);
>  			return retval;
>  		}
> -
> -		/*
> -		* We know this is the only CRU call we need to make so lets keep as
> -		* few instructions as possible once the NMI comes in.
> -		*/
> -		cmn_regs.u1.rah = 0x0D;
> -		cmn_regs.u1.ral = 0x02;
>  	}
>  
>  	/*

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-14  9:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-10 23:39 [PATCH v2 0/6] Spectre v2 updates David Woodhouse
2018-02-10 23:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] x86/speculation: Update Speculation Control microcode blacklist David Woodhouse
2018-02-11 12:08   ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for David Woodhouse
2018-02-12  9:50   ` [PATCH v2 1/6] " Darren Kenny
2018-02-12 14:16   ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-12 14:32     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-10 23:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] Revert "x86/speculation: Simplify indirect_branch_prediction_barrier()" David Woodhouse
2018-02-11 12:09   ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for David Woodhouse
2018-02-13  8:58   ` tip-bot for David Woodhouse
2018-02-13  9:41     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-13 11:28       ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-13 13:28         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-13 13:38           ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-13 15:26           ` [tip:x86/pti] x86/speculation: Add <asm/msr-index.h> dependency tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-15  0:28           ` tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-10 23:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] KVM: x86: Reduce retpoline performance impact in slot_handle_level_range() David Woodhouse
2018-02-11 12:09   ` [tip:x86/pti] KVM/x86: Reduce retpoline performance impact in slot_handle_level_range(), by always inlining iterator helper methods tip-bot for David Woodhouse
2018-02-13  8:58   ` tip-bot for David Woodhouse
2018-02-10 23:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] X86/nVMX: Properly set spec_ctrl and pred_cmd before merging MSRs David Woodhouse
2018-02-11 12:10   ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-02-13  8:59   ` tip-bot for KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-02-10 23:39 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] KVM/nVMX: Set the CPU_BASED_USE_MSR_BITMAPS if we have a valid L02 MSR bitmap David Woodhouse
2018-02-11 10:19   ` Ingo Molnar
     [not found]     ` <1518345844.3677.365.camel@amazon.co.uk>
2018-02-11 10:55       ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-11 12:10   ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-02-13  8:59   ` tip-bot for KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-02-10 23:39 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] x86/speculation: Use IBRS if available before calling into firmware David Woodhouse
2018-02-11 11:46   ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-11 10:41 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Spectre v2 updates Ingo Molnar
2018-02-11 15:19 ` [PATCH v2.1] x86/speculation: Use IBRS if available before calling into firmware David Woodhouse
2018-02-11 18:50   ` [PATCH] x86/speculation: Clean up various Spectre related details Ingo Molnar
2018-02-11 19:25     ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-11 19:43       ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-12 15:30         ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-13  8:04           ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-11 19:19   ` [tip:x86/pti] x86/speculation: Use IBRS if available before calling into firmware tip-bot for David Woodhouse
2018-02-12  5:59     ` afzal mohammed
2018-02-12 16:30       ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-12 10:22     ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-12 11:50       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-12 12:27         ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-12 13:06           ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-13  7:58           ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-12 12:28         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-12 16:13       ` Dave Hansen
2018-02-12 16:58         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-13  7:55           ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-14  1:49             ` Tim Chen
2018-02-14  8:56               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-14  8:57                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-14 19:20                 ` Tim Chen
2018-02-14 23:19                   ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-15  2:01                     ` Tim Chen
2018-02-14  9:31               ` [PATCH] watchdog: hpwdt: Remove spinlock acquire and BIOS calls from NMI context Ingo Molnar
2018-02-14  9:38                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-14 10:39                   ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-14  9:44                 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2018-02-14 18:13                   ` Jerry Hoemann
2018-02-14 23:17                     ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-15 17:44                       ` Jerry Hoemann
2018-02-15 19:02                         ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-15 19:48                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-16 18:44     ` [tip:x86/pti] x86/speculation: Use IBRS if available before calling into firmware Tim Chen
2018-02-16 19:16       ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-16 23:46         ` Tim Chen
2018-02-17 10:26           ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-19  9:20             ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-19  9:29               ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-19  9:39                 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-19  9:44                   ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-19 10:08                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-19  9:36               ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-12  8:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Spectre v2 updates Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-13  7:59   ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180214094404.GA18349@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=dave@sr71.net \
    --cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jerry.hoemann@hpe.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).